They’ve had plenty of time to fabricate deep fakes.
Predisposed.
It’s a Philip K. Dick trial.
He didn’t threaten to kill anyone in that video.
The best way to not have to use deadly force is if people believe you will use it.
Among best ways to have to use deadly force, if you can resort to it at all, is for the bad people to be dismissive of you.
Progressives seem inherently incapable of understanding that, or at least they think we should all act like pussy-wimps until the fur finally starts flying … because otherwise we might otherwise antagonize people.
Hmm... I put this up there with “anonymous sources say that Trump purportedly said that he was the reincarnation of Napoleon”
Let’s see the video.
I’m sure Kyle is merely saying “if these guys attack me, I’m shooting them.” (if he even said anything like that at all)
Fake news.
everyone who is interested in self defense is ‘predisposed to use force’ if the unfortunate need arises- that doesn’t mean they set out to kill someone for no reason- millions o f gun owners who would use deadly force if they regrettably were forced into that situation, have had guns for 100’s of years and haven’t just gone around shooting people for no reason- and have been fortunate enough to go their whole lives never having to defend themselves i n a life and death situation like Kyle was in
ok this is just STUPID reaching by the prosecution (what else is new)
“They claim it shows Rittenhouse 15 days before the Kenosha unrest outside a drug store.
He watches people he believed were shoplifting.
“It looks like one of them has a weapon,” the man believed to be Rittenhouse says in the video. “I wish I had my (expletive) AR. I’d start shooting rounds at them.”
There’s no explanation in the court filing on where the video was shot or how prosecutors obtained it.
They argue it shows Rittenhouse “threatened to kill someone based on his baseless assumption and wrongful interpretation.””
This event does NOT show premeditation - this event is not even similar to the circumstances where Kyle had to shoot IN SELF DEFENSE.
The shooting is all on camera - Kyle was not the aggressor but being attacked and chased.
They'll have to do better than 'purportedly' if they want to use it to convict him.
You don't say.
yes- and the Covington Catholic School kids “purportedly” chanted build the wall...build the wall...
They have found some sketchy evidence that Rittenhouse was willing to defend himself, and two weeks later, a few thugs tried to kill him.
Doesn’t matter. Hubris watching a video is just that - “big talk”. I see a lot of that here. It doesn’t mean that it causes you to give up your right to self defense when attacked.
Where’s the voice analysis evidence?
"They claim it shows Rittenhouse 15 days before the Kenosha unrest outside a drug store.He watches people he believed were shoplifting.
"It looks like one of them has a weapon," the man believed to be Rittenhouse says in the video. "I wish I had my (expletive) AR. I'd start shooting rounds at them."
Good luck with that, Mr. Persecutor, convincing Judge Schroeder to commit that mistake.
Also f the MSM for this agitprop which makes the average dweeb believe this happened the same night.
Hey. . .right now in this moment. . I am also “predisposed” to the use of deadly force to defend myself, my family and property, courtesy of the 2nd Amendment and my M&P 9mm. All thugs and punks take notice.
Also, the person in the video basically stated he already had a AR type rifle, whereas Mr. Rittenhouse didn’t get the one he used until the day he went to Kenosha.
Ashli Babbit may still be alive today if her murderer warned her.
Once again the doj is trying to influence the jury pool.