Minor v. Happersett declares that nobody has ever questioned the citizenship of individuals born on U.S. soil to two U.S. citizen parents.
I am adding to this formula the following: Citizenship in the country of, say, Luxembourg, bestowed at birth via a new Luxembougian naturalization law, with no further action that need be taken by the child or its parents other than the seasonable presentation of proof that at least one grandparent of the child is or was a citizen of Luxembourg.
PS...walk the mile with me. Why so skittish?
Please. Focus. Kindly answer this question based on the foregoing hypothetical.
Is the dual citizen child in question an NBC, or no?
I'm not sure if you realize it or not but you are using the exact same twisted logic that liberals use about birth not determining gender. Gender is set in stone at birth and no law or argument can change that. You are trying to say that some law in luxumstan somehow changes the physical place of ones birth and or the parents to which they were born and that's simply impossible. Natural born status like gender is set in stone at birth and no law or twisted liberal thinking can change those facts. You can't be born in more than one place and you can't have more than two parents.
It's like saying a man in the United States is also a woman because a law in Electroluxumstan says so. So a NBC of the United states by definition cannot also be a citizen by birth of another country. You are either a Natural born citizen or you are not.