Well, I suppose that they'd have to be, wouldn't they? After all, that was a hundred years ago. So I doubt that they were teenagers or young adults.
Regards,
I read it as the “alleged” is that they say they were in Tulsa during those days, in 1921. Given the recent history of the Democrat Party, I would not be shocked if much of these stories are lies.
Well, the “alleged” part has to do with their presence at the scene of the so-called “Tulsa Massacre,” not that they were infants and/or toddlers once upon a time. I don’t know what evidence has been produced to verify that these individuals were living in that neighborhood in 1921. Anyone can claim to be anything, especially when they’re demanding reparations of $1 million per survivor from the city of Tulsa .