Posted on 06/03/2021 9:13:47 AM PDT by Hojczyk
Emails show Dr. Anthony Fauci was advised by Erik Nielsen, a physicist and CEO of Bio-Signal Technologies, in March 2020, that two drugs could possibly help battle the coronavirus pandemic, but Fauci ignored it, claiming the email was “too long” for him to read.
Nielsen, in the email, said he had instructed members of his family to get “Alvesco (ciclesonide) for emergency use only.” He claimed that his “colleagues on the front-line in Japan, China, and Korea found several pre-print papers, that it is an effective treatment for late-stage COVID-19 patients.”
The physicist continued, “Some patients on ventilators who were approaching death have fully recovered after treatment with ciclesonide,” noting “ciclesonide has much smaller particles than other corticosteroids, so it reaches deeper into lungs and alveolis.”
Neilsen claimed there was a second drug that could possibly be used, which he advised his family to get. He wrote to Fauci the drug “is called hydroxychloroquine,” which he said, “also seems to be effective and safe.”
However, he noted, “Alvesco is better because it appears to prevent the virus from replicating so infection is wiped out and no longer contagious. Alvesco seems to be two silver bullets in one.”
Two days after this email, Fauci, to whom the media looked for a trusted voice, said,”The answer is no” when he was asked if hydroxychloroquine is an effective coronavirus treatment during one of the coronavirus task force briefings that took place regularly under the Trump administration. Fauci noted that the “signs of the drug’s promise were purely ‘anecdotal evidence.'”
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
> Amongst your trolling, the absolute most laughable has been your consistent deflection rather than explain why the Georgia GOP observers were purposely defrauded by Democrat officials at State Farm Arena and forced to leave under a straight-up lie.
As far as I can tell they were not forced to leave. You can watch the video to see this for yourself. In fact, based on the video I see no indication that any election worker even addressed the observers or media directly. Have you even watched the security video made available by the GA SoS or are you just swallowing everything Giuliani, et. al. sold based on the highly “curated” snippets they showed during their farcical performance in front of the GA senate judiciary committee?
But he had lots of time to do back-patting interviews...
Yeah, your track record stops. right. there.
> You know, since you’re a statistical genius and all, counselor, I’d say the odds are stacked against you...
Are you a Q-bot? If so, I’d say your predisposition to conspiratorial thinking is leading you to find what you believe to be significant patterns in what is actually noise or coincidence. I don’t know anything about law, but I thought that poster (troll or not) said some reasonable things. I am only posting here because I am concerned for the United States. I am a conservative but I’m not a Trump supporter. The last two presidential elections I voted “none of the above.” If that’s not good enough, then I’m fine if the mods ban me.
biden, fauxi, and the cdc recommending lockdowns, cancellations of events, masks, and vaccines for our citizens to stop the spread of a “deadly virus” while biden opened the border, invited, welcomed, and continues to freely spread thousands of “disease carrying invaders” across our country during a “global pandemic” reeks of hypocrisy and proves we’re being lied to about the severity of this so called “deadly virus”...
You're not a conservative if you're not a Trump supporter. Period. Paragraph.
"The last two presidential elections I voted “none of the above.”
In Texas. Reason enough to ban you right there. Stupid is as stupid does.
"If that’s not good enough, then I’m fine if the mods ban me."
It's not good enough. So either Report Abuse on yourself or Freepmail JimRob to be banned. Cuz yeah, you gotta go, and you should do it yourself. It's only right.
>Here’s the thing, you’re anti-Trump, so what’s in it for you here? I’m happy to punch down until you have to come back under another name.
There is not really much in it for me, other than perhaps some small hope that I can occasionally counter some bit of misinformation. I only chimed in on this particular topic (i.e. the fallacious assertion that the article in question was from Fauci’s publication) because I have done a good deal of work with PubMed/NLM data and know something about it. But in any case, if this board is only for Trump supporters and dissenting conservative voices are not welcome, then I am more than happy to go.
It’s timing is definitely suspicious.
Again....excellent work in exposing this anti-Trump, pro-FRAUDci troll.
> You’re not a conservative if you’re not a Trump supporter. Period. Paragraph.
You see, that’s where you’re wrong. Conservatism is not ultimately about politics. It is about the way we see our place in the universe — our relationship with the past, with the future, with the land, with other people, and most importantly with God. Once you have defined your brand of conservatism purely in terms of politics you can be absolutely certain that it is no longer conservatism. In the past this was one of the things that most distinguished conservatives from those on the Left, but now it seems true conservatives are few and far between, and what’s left are just radicals of various stripes and colors.
Shit, dude, are you waiting for someone to object? Begone.
I call them asstrolls.
This is just pure undistilled faggotry. Bye.
Inconceivable!
Fauci actually did coauthor some papers back around 2005 where HCQ was mentioned, but these papers only referred to its anti-malarial properties; there was absolutely no mention in these papers of HCQ in the context of treating SARS-CoV-1.
Even now, there are 'FReepers' defending Fauci.
Amazing.
#DoingTheDevilsWork
Even now, there are ‘FReepers’ defending Fauci.
See upthread posts.
Troll has been exposed, but good.
At least the “vax” trolls, for the most part, don’t openly profess their FRAUDci love.
You got a problem with Q-bots, Mister Derp State shill?
Funny think about 'conspiracy theories', even when they are exposed as 'conspiracy facts', there are some still deeply conditioned to not believe them.
That would be you.
#BroCrush
'Misinformation' is a very popular word with Derp State 'fact checkers' and Snopes.
Right up there with 'conspiracy theory'.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.