I think if Mark Levin had more humor he would be a close second to Rush as he has good judgment and constitutional opinions. Some even better than rush.
“Replace Rush” to me means those who can do news discussions dealing with current events in light of true conservative viewpoints, but with the ability to present information and the conservative philosophy for easy comprehension by all, AND with humor. Loads of humor.
The problem with all of these replacement-wannabe’s is that they are boring boring boring. Rush was fun, he laughed at the situations and told us why they were funny, and he couldn’t contain himself during the discussions. Only Mark Steyne comes close, but Dana is funny, too. Her impersonations and silly voices when she’s mocking some hoity-toity wine-and-croissant actress or news reader are hilarious. She needs to develop more running gags/bits (I know she does Florida Man, that’s a start). But compare with Rush, with his theme songs for animal rights and gay life, and does anyone remember his caller abortion sound effect (flushing toilet when he hung up on crazy callers)? Etc. And Rush’s parody songs and parody skits with....? Paul Shankland....were great. That’s what I want, with the conservative viewpoint and discussion, not terse angry monotone lectures.