“Just because there’s limitations, Robert’s Rules of Order gives savvy operators wiggle room to advance agendas regardless of what the established rules are going in.”
That makes no sense. Give us a “For example,” please. State specifically what would happen, who would say what, who is in charge, and what the outcome would be.
“Roberts Rules Of Order” lol...wut?
Your reading comprehension is diminished and you’ve tried to pick a fight with someone who cares less what a wet brain Kool-Aid drinking advocate has to say about the COS. Read what I said, I am not a lawyer nor did I stay at the Holiday Inn Express last night, I don’t know how it will get hijacked, but I do know that we as as a collective society cannot run a clean election and yet they and you want a COS.
I expect if the Western Alliance of Governors said we’ll push the COS thru our legislatures but in return we want UN or Chinese observers at the Convention the COS’ advocacy would undoubtedly think that’s a great idea too. Unbelievable.
Roberts Rules: No rule can be suspended if the negative vote is as large as the minority the rule was intended to protect.
Parliamentarian: The nomination filibuster protects minorities in the Senate of size 41 or larger. It cannot be ended unless 60 senators support doing so.
Harry Reid: The parliamentarian’s point is not well taken. We’ve got 57 votes, and majority is enough.