[Jonty30]

The only time the military should intervene is if we have run out of all possible legal options for present and future elections.

That means, despite what happened, if it was impossible to fix at the state level and 100% of the population voted, but the election was predetermined anyway.

[MNDude]

“The only time the military should intervene is if we have run out of all possible legal options for present and future elections.”

Absolutely, but the existence of court systems does not mean there are real legal options if they are part of the fraud machine. Even North Korea has “courts.”

Would you not support military intervention if it meant securing all future elections from fraud and systemic control?

[Chickensoup]

Sort of like now?

[DoodleDawg]

The only time the military should intervene is if we have run out of all possible legal options for present and future elections.

If the military intevenes then doesn't that end the possibility for present or future elections for the forseeable future?

[Dr. Franklin]

The only time the military should intervene is if we have run out of all possible legal options for present and future elections.
That means, despite what happened, if it was impossible to fix at the state level and 100% of the population voted, but the election was predetermined anyway.

Military service members all take an oath to defend the U.S. against all enemies, foreign and domestic. If the courts are incapable of protecting the U.S. from domestic enemies working for foreign governments, who is left to do the job?