Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ga. PD launches 'Shoot to Incapacitate' program
Atlanta Journal-Constitution (through Police 1) ^ | 5/7/2021 | Brad Schrade

Posted on 05/09/2021 5:36:06 AM PDT by No.6

(excerpt) The training is part of a new program launched by the West Georgia agency meant to address some of these questions. The program, called "Shoot to Incapacitate," is challenging decades of police orthodoxy around use of deadly force. Instead of teaching officers to always aim for available center mass of the body — usually the chest, upper torso and head — the training is giving them another option if they must fire their weapons in the line of duty.

The course is the first of its kind in Georgia and could well be a first in the nation. It is teaching officers that in some instances where they are authorized to use deadly force, they have the option to aim for the pelvic region, abdomen, legs and arms of a person posing a threat. The idea is that a gunshot to these areas, while still potentially deadly, could stop the threat while increasing the chance that the wounds will not be fatal.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: banglist; biden; firearms; georgia; police
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last
Long article -- you decide if it's worth a read, I think I've excerpted the salient part. There's a bit buried in among the anecdotal quotes about using one or another intended target based on the range from the officer -- no chance that'll get subjected to SJW scrutiny or get people killed as they try and figure out whether they're about to get killed or merely fired...

Looks like wokist Biden fantasies are being taken seriously by real police departments. The comments express the obvious well and are worth the read.

1 posted on 05/09/2021 5:36:06 AM PDT by No.6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: No.6

idiotic


2 posted on 05/09/2021 5:38:40 AM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No.6
It is teaching officers that in some instances where they are authorized to use deadly force, they have the option to aim for the pelvic region, abdomen, legs and arms of a person posing a threat. The idea is that a gunshot to these areas, while still potentially deadly, could stop the threat while increasing the chance that the wounds will not be fatal.

The Law Enforcement Officers should likewise be required to fire only a SINGLE shot, and then wait to see if that shot has the desired effect - before then firing a SECOND shot, and waiting, etc.

Otherwise, we are going to see LEOs unloading their revolvers into the perp's legs. QUESTION: Are six shots to the legs MORE or LESS deadly than a single shot to the center of mass?

Regards,

3 posted on 05/09/2021 5:40:31 AM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No.6

They really out to initiate a “Shoot the gun out of his hand” program. That’s how it used to be done — saw it all the time on TV when I was a youngster.


4 posted on 05/09/2021 5:42:21 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy ("I see you did something -- why you so racist?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No.6

Bet federal law enforcement agencies won’t be following suit.

Go figure.


5 posted on 05/09/2021 5:44:36 AM PDT by mewzilla (Those aren't masks. They're muzzles. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alexander_busek
QUESTION: Are six shots to the legs MORE or LESS deadly than a single shot to the center of mass?

Anyone that seriously thinks that shooting someone in the leg (with a single shot, let alone multiple ones) is less deadly than shooting someone center mass has zero comprehension of human physiology.

6 posted on 05/09/2021 5:45:19 AM PDT by Turbo Pig ('to close with and destroy the enemy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: No.6

Just shoot the guns out of their hands. Really!
I saw Roy Rogers on TV do it all the time.
Lone Ranger too.


7 posted on 05/09/2021 5:45:58 AM PDT by Vinnie ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No.6

So, no critical mass. Do they now aim for the left buttock if the perp is Black?


8 posted on 05/09/2021 5:46:41 AM PDT by chuckee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Roy Rogers could draw both of his sixguns at the same time and shoot both of the bad guy’s six guns out of his hands at the same time.


9 posted on 05/09/2021 5:47:57 AM PDT by OKSooner ("Burn-Loot-Murder, the Post-American Urban Triathlon.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: No.6

I hope the PDs get sued out of existence if they take this route. Anyone pushing this crap has had any experience with a fire fight. You are not shooting at a paper target. Your life or someone else’s is on the line and on top of ensuring you are making the correct call to shoot you are now supposed to decide what part of the body to shoot at? As soon as some copper cancels some perp’s ticket will come the suits for not disabling him.


10 posted on 05/09/2021 5:51:10 AM PDT by Mouton (The enemy of the people is the media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No.6

The fact that someone actually wrote this article, let alone that there is someone in LEO that thinks this is a good idea, shows exactly how finished this country is. America can withstand existentialist threats way beyond what people think it can. It cannot withstand the idiocy that has permeated society at every level that brings this sort of thing to the front.


11 posted on 05/09/2021 5:51:31 AM PDT by Turbo Pig ('to close with and destroy the enemy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No.6

And lawyers salivate.


12 posted on 05/09/2021 5:52:20 AM PDT by Vision (Elections are one day. Reject "Chicago" vote harvesting. Election Reform Now. Obama is an evildoer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No.6

In a wildly dynamic situation NO ONE has such control over shot placement that they can entertain such silly shite.


13 posted on 05/09/2021 5:52:39 AM PDT by TalBlack (We have a Christian duty and a patriotic duty. God help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No.6

I am sure that part of this training involves watching a lot of old Roy Roger and Gene Autry cowboy movies.

An adrenalin hyped up or drug up bad guy can still do stuff with shots to the abdomen or legs.


14 posted on 05/09/2021 5:52:46 AM PDT by DOC44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

Ashli Babbitt’s killer didn’t shoot to wound.


15 posted on 05/09/2021 5:53:37 AM PDT by mewzilla (Those aren't masks. They're muzzles. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: No.6

How about the police just hide behind their payroll vehicles when something looks dangerous to the public? That’s what they did at the Parkland school shooting, and no suspects were endangered.


16 posted on 05/09/2021 5:55:49 AM PDT by Telepathic Intruder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No.6

Buckle up, buckaroos!

17 posted on 05/09/2021 5:55:56 AM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham ("God is a spirit, and man His means of walking on the earth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No.6

This will not end well.


18 posted on 05/09/2021 5:56:17 AM PDT by Roklok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No.6

Whoever came up with the ‘Shoot to Incapacitate’ program and whatever government official or police chief who agrees to have their police department adopt such a program should be summarily fired for being an eminent threat to the police and the lawabiding community.


19 posted on 05/09/2021 5:56:30 AM PDT by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No.6

Because bullets go to the target area and no further./s


20 posted on 05/09/2021 5:58:15 AM PDT by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson