Mike Lindell Really Does Have Irrefutable Proof That The Election Was Stolen

LINDELLTV.COM ^

[rlmorel]

I admit to thinking you were actually interested in understanding it, I didn’t realize that wasn’t your goal, and it was my mistake to try.

Mike Lindell may know nothing, but I at least give him credit for creating, growing, and running a successful business, something a lot of people (including his many self-absorbed, and vocal critics) have never done and failed at it, or never even tried. He is putting his money and reputation on the line. Again, more

I didn’t find Dr. Frank unfocused, but I did actually watch the video to see what he was talking about. However, Dr. Frank was unfocused enough to get together enough volunteers to get out and actually physically knock on doors to find out who lived there in an attempt to correlate targeted voters to see if his hypothesis was correct.

I’ll take that kind of un-focus any day over electronic reams of vapid keyboard warrioring.

He and Mike Lindell, unlike many including those who label themselves as patriots or Conservatives, actually is trying to do something about it.

Happy Easter to you.

[sport]

Joe Biden, Kameltoe Harris, the Democrat Party, The Republican Party?

[Rightwing Conspiratr1]

The ballots cast has the same curve as registered voters except for a smaller percentage of the younger voters and a higher percentage of older voters. How is that evidence of fraud? What is a "correlation factor" of 1.000? Someone else asked for the algorithm, I woulld say I don't want to know. This whole thing is a complete waste of time. The physics guy was not convincing, and Mike Lindell knows absolutely nothing.

The formula for calculating correlation is: The correlation between ballots cast and registrations for all counties in Ohio is .9993109593 which is of course EXACTLY what one would expect. You will notice he doesn't apply his curve fitting formula to counties like Geauga or Athens which had high and low turnouts respectively. So no, it's not evidence of fraud. It means turnout is reemarkably consistent across the State and across age groups. That's not weird or odd. Lindell is brain dead stupid, and Dr. Frank has to be a FRAUD in order to MISUSE correlation in such a manner.

Lets not forget that Ohio uses around seven different voting machine vendors[*] with at least three different methods of voting all using different software. This would require hundreds of lizard people embedded into all these companies and all 88 counties to enter Dr. Frank's magic "Sixth degree polynomial equation".

[*] ftp://sosftp.sos.state.oh.us/free/publications/website/maps/votingSystems.pdf

[Rightwing Conspiratr1]

Well, Rightwing Conspiratr1....

We’re waiting

If you are waiting for a link to the numbers I posted from the official Ohio election results at ohiosos.gov you're going to be waiting forever. Consider it a challenge to the stupid and lazy.

[Wilderness Conservative]

My faith is in God. Badges and uniforms are as corrupted as the suits in the swamp.

[Rightwing Conspiratr1]

To have EVERY SINGLE AGE GROUP BALLOTS CAST BY AGE MATCH THE SHAPES OF THE REGISTERED VOTERS CURVES EXACTLY WITH A +1.000 CORRELATION FACTOR AS SHOWN IN THE SECOND GRAPHIC DOWN IS IMPOSSIBLE WITHOUT HUMAN INTERVENTION.

It is a demonstratable fact that the correlation factor is NOT +1.000.
For that to be true the turnout ratio for each county would have to be exactly the same! Clearly it is not.

See Pearson correlation coefficient

[romanesq]

“Sad thing is that he isn’t even chasing the right rabbit. The fraud that did occur happened with mail in ballots.”

^^^ This ^^^

[romanesq]

HR 1 is failing.

[romanesq]

You’re reducing factors in mail inballots. Dems designed the process FOR fraud.

It was a process planned over months. Removing election integrity was key to that process.

Trump won, by a lot.

Why do you think Karl Rove called and congratulated President Trump before midnight? Because he doesn’t know voting data?

[romanesq]

Why?

[romanesq]

Did you really just write that the QAnon grifters are “proof” President Trump won? 🙅🏼‍♂️🤣🐸🙅🏾‍♂️🤦‍♂️

[Georgia Girl 2]

Of course it was stolen.

[palmer]

Why did the slope go downwards? Because once you subtract the straight ticket voters (horizontal axis) the remaining voters (vertical axis) are more likely to vote for the opposition. That’s true for both parties.

[GOPJ]

bttt

[romanesq]

“the remaining voters (vertical axis) are more likely to vote for the opposition.”

The analysis on this and it’s been extensive shows the mail in ballots that came in for Biden in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Georgia far exceeded the percentage of votes he could be expected to win at that stage.

Remember, this was happening in the dead of night. Those tallies are suspect for that reason alone.

But worse, the percentages were coming in at the greatest margin anywhere at any time across the tabulations of that state’s election.

It reeks and badly I might add.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

It’s proof that you’re a liar.

[Rightwing Conspiratr1]

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Nice selfie.

[palmer]

The analysis on this and it’s been extensive shows the mail in ballots that came in for Biden in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Georgia far exceeded the percentage of votes he could be expected to win at that stage.

That's right. No algorithm needed, just fraud.

Remember, this was happening in the dead of night. Those tallies are suspect for that reason alone.

The reason is happened in the dead of night is after they kicked out the observers they brought in batches of suspect ballots, altereed existing ballots, etc. All without any observers.

But worse, the percentages were coming in at the greatest margin anywhere at any time across the tabulations of that state’s election.

Yes, all easily explained Algorithmic bias: not easy to explain and no evidence for it.

[Rightwing Conspiratr1]