[DannyTN]

1) If we can't stop vote by mail we need to have controls to at least prevent fraud.

They need to have professional auditors review the Navarro report and develop controls to prevent every type of fraud and irregularity. And then we need legislation and/or court orders to enforce those goals.

We also need to examine the claims made against the voting software companies and the controls allegedly in place. And put in place additional controls and preventive measures to stop and prevent electronic fraud.

While it would be nice to catch and prosecute individuals committing fraud in the past, it's more important to get the controls in place for the future.

But we need to legislate severe penalties for violating any of the controls from allowing observers to internet connections to chain of custody...everything.

The legislation for the added controls needs to be both at the state and federal level.

2) If we can't stop vote by mail, then we need to counter the influx of low information voters.

Which means that we need to educate those voters. To educate them, we need ways of reaching them outside of the MSM. We need to take over some of the MSM so that we can reach them.

That means we need ways of reaching and educating:

• existing low information voters.
• young people soon to become voters.
• immigrants both legal and illegal who may obtain citizenship in the future.

Perhaps we should even have educational campaigns in the countries the immigrants are coming from.

Things we need to educate them on:

• The importance of the amendments in the bill of rights. Democrats are always attacking these, so getting voters to understand their importance is a way to drive a wedge between low information voters and democrats.
• Economic Systems: The difference between free markets and capitalism and socialism. Why capitalism results in better livelihoods for even the poor. And why socialism ends up needing to resort to draconian government control of people to remain in power. And the dismal results of socialism in every country where it's been tried. Again, if voters understand the economic systems pros and cons, it's a way of driving a wedge between voters and democrats advocating socialist policies.
• The importance of checks and balances in government. And what constitutes an abuse in any of the three branches.
• The role of media and how to recognize bias and opinion and influence pedaling vs facts. It seems like we are having some success in this area.
• Issues. They need to understand both sides of every issue. Not just what is pushed by MSM.
• Character, values and skill sets. Voters need to become better at discerning character. Like why it's unwise to put a plagiarizer and bribe receiver in the white house. They also need to understand values and where they come from and how they influence character. And finally they need to have some understanding of skill sets and what's required to do the job of elected officials.

[LurkedLongEnough]

For those interested in refining the current system of education (especially during this golden opportunity post-COVID), look into https://www.edchoice.org/school-choice/

[unixfox]

If we can’t stop vote by mail we need to use it against them. Fight fire with fire.
Stick it right up their asses.

[Governor Dinwiddie]

We need to bring back the poll tax and the literacy test.

I'm not kidding. No joke.

[Jacquerie]

Three pubbie senators, (Packwood, Specter, Hatfield) put the Motor Voter act over the top of a filibuster.

The precedent of flooding the zone with illegals was set in 1993.

Further erosion was as certain as sunrise tomorrow.

[KTM rider]

they got the idea at these election oficials conventions they go to, Oregon imposed mail in only decades ago. The state is a parliamentry Autocracy and it set the precedent on controlling election results. They even know how you voted by the bar code on the outside of the envelope (it knows your party). The election results are announced before the sun even sets (as soon as the drop boxes are picked up, why bother counting)

rest assured Oregon will never have a conteststed election

Early voting is the other invention that allows activists to vote multiple times, but the E.V. method has problems if the opposition has a landslide

[jackibutterfly]

"They need to have professional auditors review the Navarro report and develop controls to prevent every type of fraud and irregularity."

Who is "they"?