Posted on 03/30/2021 9:30:20 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
“Assigned female at birth?”
I would suggest that the doctor who completes the Birth Certificate checks Female or Male meaning that the state will rely on the “assignment” made someone actually trained to make the determination of gender rather than some woke lesbian mother.
Exactly so. Eons and eons ago.
“ Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, and before you were born I consecrated you; I appointed you a prophet to the nations. ”— Jeremiah 1:5
Lawmakers in several other states have already passed bills this year attempting to change the rights of transgender individuals.
Lawmakers in several other states have already passed bills this year attempting to protect the rights of female at birth individuals. Fixed
The “woke” will start having TBD put under sex on the birth certificate.
Nobody assigned anything.
The doctor looked and stated the obvious.
No, she blinded, got her head handed to her so she is back tracking. But these are solid EO. She is redeeming herself.
👍👍
“They make it sound as if such an “assignment” is an arbitrary designation...”
Yes, and that is exactly what they are trying to do, make gender arbitrary. Typical Communist tactic.
IS she banning transgender females in Women College Sports ?
So now the dimwit is trying to recover from her weakkneed veto of an actual law with an executive order that also will be tried in court!
She wouldn’t sign the bill her legislature passed that included Women’s College Sports because of her fear of the NCAA holding back events in her state and being sued by the NCAA.
Instead sent it back for only women’s sports in K-12th grade.
She claimed “legal scholars” told her she would likely lose court cases against the NCAA.
A leader fights the fights worth fighting, not just the cases you have a good chance of winning.
This is what it looks like when men play women’s college sports:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ncaab/2012/12/04/college-basketball-transgender-player-gabrielle-ludwig-robert-ludwig-mission-college/1744703/
yes
Yep, she took the coward’s approach due to the NCAA and pressure from deep pockets. Some battles are worth fighting.
So you want he to waste $millions of taxpayer money fighting a fight she would likely lose because the bill was flawed. You are really not very bright. Good leaders fight the fights they can win, there is no sense of fighting for a bill that’s flawed in that it was written to broadly. It was a poorly written bill. You should be taking up your complaints with the SD Legislature since they wrote a c flawed bill and refused to fix it.
I agree. “Jr. High Women” sounds so much better.
.
That can be said of many comments on FR threads these days. Kinda sad when ya stop and think about it.
Trying to catch up? Are you being intentionally dense? Or are some of you here just to cause strife?
Yes, you stick up and fight for the young girls and women entering college - who cares if it costs you a little.
Watch her interviews, that’s not what she said - she caved to the left plain and simple, and you fight the fight that need to fought - you don’t cower like the pussy you are because you might lose in court.
Arkansas Governor signed into law last week, a law banning any transgender males playing in women’s sports - he was crying about about the NCAA, and Arkansas College sports are much bigger than South Dakota.
You are aware that the EO’s that you approve of are the SAME things she was trying to get changed that you say she is back tracking on?
She needs no redemption... She just needs more people to read past the opposition headlines.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.