[Manly Warrior]

Daniel,

Your [added comments] inject your opinion of what the SGM states. That is not helpful to a person reading it for context.

Not saying I disagree with your interjection/interpretation, but thinking folks can decide for themselves what the intent is.

A true warrior doesn’t need his SGM/general to tell him what right looked likes, just needs them to provide them with the best plan to kill the enemy.

Social distraction at best, will not result in a “house cleaning purge”.

Good men will still fill the ranks.

[DarthVader]

I concur with you as the concerns the SM is making is a mild social distraction being reemphasized on top of long existing policy.

[Hulka]

I went first to the link and read what the moron said. Then I went to the thread and read it with his comments. Reading the original and then his comments adds context as to his opinion.

I know, I know, Freepers are not usually going to read past the headline, let alone the original article. . .such is FR.

[Theophilus]

Social distraction at best, will not result in a “house cleaning purge”.

it's not the purge that worries me it's the impossible task of recruiting.

[iontheball]

Good men will still fill the ranks.
__________________________________
I beg to disagree. No true patriot is going to join a military to be a social justice warrior. Watch as ‘volunteer military’ numbers collapse and world vultures pounce.

[daniel1212]

"Your [added comments] inject your opinion of what the SGM states. That is not helpful to a person reading it for context. Not saying I disagree with your interjection/interpretation, but thinking folks can decide for themselves what the intent is."

I am hardly reading a foreign meaning into what the SGM states, as anyone familiar with what the use of such such terms as "bigots, sexist and homophobes" includes would or should recognize the sarge is writing in the interest of conforming recruits to liberal ethos. And while thinking folks can decide for themselves what the intent is, yet if you read all the comments you can see that while most perceive this liberal agenda at work here, yet a few basically fail to see this even with my my added added comments (if they even read them). And in fact, it is a common practice among many posters here to only include 2 or 3 sentences from a source and which is all posters read and never even go to the link. As evidenced yesterday in this thread. Thus my emphasis and comments are warranted.