Posted on 03/16/2021 7:59:06 AM PDT by Renkluaf
Disqus is a member of the fifth-column leftist enemydia.
So, when does a class action suit against the Southern Poverty Law Center begin? Seems to me, a non-lawyer, that it’s a big, fat fabulously wealthy target for some enterprising lawyers to take aim at.
SPLC needs to be either sued out of existence, or...you know, the thing.
The SPLC is itself a “hate group”.
It is long past time to start thinking about what should bone about the SPLC.
Discussions, of course, should be private and not on computer.
Perhaps a suitable conclusion might be reached.
Lying and sleaze really should not be permitted.
Since the left can dox, why cannot we?
Easy to show damages and they have been susceptible to these kind of suits before.
Since when does SPLC become the sole judge on what’s hate and what’s not. This organization needs to be exposed. I think they should start with some defamation lawsuits.
On March 3rd the Editors at FrontPage received an email from Disqus, the networked community platform used by hundreds of thousands of sites all over the web. The statement reads:
It has come to our attention that your site is included in the Hate Groups listed on the Southern Poverty Law Center Hate Map:
Sue the SPLC for libel
That’s libel and torturous interference.
Yep
How is it that you can be defined as hateful?
Because they say so.
And who appointed the Southern Poverty “Law” Center the supreme authority as to what constitutes hate? They’re one of the most hateful groups of piled up excrement I ever heard of.
Yes, but do we have enough of a legal system left that would find against a favored, far left, organization which is a go to source for labeling and referral of hate groups as defined by the Marxists?
To a layman - like me - it’s hard to see how being placed on a list like SPLC’s ‘Hate Group’ list where the practical impact of being placed on the list results in tangible, material and quite possibly monetary damages is protected as a privilege, or defense against a defamation claim. How in the world is this not defamatory?
I’m sure SLPC’s lawyers would argue that the list is protected as ‘Rhetorical Hyperbole.’ But, can it be hyperbole when people placed on that list receive real-world damage?
If some courts have found that a lawyer being called an ‘ambulance chaser’ is defamatory (and they have), then how would this also not be defamatory?
Unfortunately though, since 1964, the Court’s incredibly narrow reading of defamation law has made prevailing in cases like this very, very difficult. It’s time to revisit NY Times v Sullivan, IMO.
While the SPLC’s libelous interference may feel torturous, I think the word you want is tortious.
It was a tortuous, twisting path, at a tortoise-like pace getting to my post!
“Sounds like a great law suit against SPLC for deformation.”
Did they turn him into a newt?
Months ago Disqus banned my account due to making conservative comments on a news article....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.