Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Meatspace
How does the bill define social media company?

Yeah would FR be included in that discription?

4 posted on 03/05/2021 1:44:28 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: DannyTN

FR is a lot more tolerant of dissent than FB.


6 posted on 03/05/2021 1:51:25 PM PST by Fai Mao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: DannyTN

I don’t recall ever being censored on FR. I spent last Sunday in FB “jail” for posting info on COVID they didn’t like. BTW, it wasn’t my viewpoint. It was stats from around the world. It has gotten really obvious what they are up to.


10 posted on 03/05/2021 2:08:18 PM PST by lonestar (Texan for Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: DannyTN

“Yeah would FR be included in that discription?”

If you were forced to identify yourself by your real name and not allowed to re-register if banned, then yes.

Fortunately Jim doesn’t operate that way.


13 posted on 03/05/2021 2:59:10 PM PST by BobL (TheDonald.win is now Patriots.win)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: DannyTN
Yeah would FR be included in that discription?

LOL. As if we want the government to arbitrarily decide who the 1st Amendment should apply to.

I assure you it will apply to FR if the Democrats ever retake Texas.

16 posted on 03/05/2021 6:01:10 PM PST by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson