Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rxsid

My opinion is that he could of said unless directed from the supream court to certify the election at this point I cant certify becouse of irregularities in the election....that would of forced the supream court to look at the issues... I am not a lawyer so any lawyer in here please correct me if I am wrong in the assumptions on law I am masking.


26 posted on 03/03/2021 12:46:30 PM PST by PCPOET7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: PCPOET7

My opinion is that he could of said unless directed from the supream court to certify the election at this point I cant certify becouse of irregularities in the election


and the supreme court could have simply stated the state legislatures must investigate all claims and then certify....



197 posted on 03/03/2021 3:22:21 PM PST by patriotspride (Third generation Vet. Never forget the true cost of freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: PCPOET7

He was never asked to decertify anything. He was asked to temporarily set aside certain Electors until their states had a chance to investigate the massive fraud they were unearthing. State legislatures had written him urgently to postpone counting Electors for about a week to ten days.

Article II of the Constitution gives all power to state legislators over matters dealing with their Electors.

During the postponement,
Trump lawyers were set to present to Congress the evidence of fraud and rigging by the CCP and others.


266 posted on 03/03/2021 5:56:55 PM PST by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson