Why did you show that photo? Went to snipes (sorry it was just a starting point.) they identify the man in the photo as a porn actor named Brad Patton. Went to google images and saw numerous (clean) photos. The man in the photo is Brad Patton, not Mike Pence.
But posting that photo is part and parcel with this bull crap word salad of an interview. And yes, I read the whole thing. The objection in court, if this were testimony, would be “lacks foundation.” After throwing out purported credentials, the interviewee gives all this explosive info with no explanation at all as to how he knows these things. It’s a big word salad, that’s all it is.
And I DONT EVEN LIKE MIKE PENCE. He did a serviceable job, but just that. I didnt want him on the ticket and won’t support him if he runs for POTUS in the future. He’s way too dull to broadly appeal to the electorate.
But I am more than sick and tired of the constant BS we have been fed by Wood and Powell these last four months. Their krakens have done us far more harm than good
Our crackpots are bored in their sandbox so they start/ infiltrating normal threads.
Re: 37 - thanks for doing the research and calling out Wilderness Conservative.
Wilderness Conservative, today is a good day for all FReepers. Because you showed how lazy you are. So lazy that you could not do the research that makes a convincing case that the two people in the images in your post are not the same person.
Essentially, you did some ‘jackassin and made a claim by posting those photos - and nothing else, Thankfully you got called out for doing that.
So all FReepers got a bonus by virtue of your post - 1) you outed yourself as a troll, 2) you wrecked your credibility. How utterly pathetic.
Maybe Brad Patton is Mike’s porn name?
Like Mitt Romney = Pierre Delecto?