Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UC says Blue Shield sought ‘expansive’ patient data as part of its COVID-19 work for California
LA Times ^ | 02/26/2021 | MELODY GUTIERREZ

Posted on 02/27/2021 6:14:15 PM PST by BenLurkin

Blue Shield of California initially sought an “expansive” amount of medical data from the University of California Health system in exchange for vaccine doses under the state’s revamped allocation plan that awards extensive powers to the insurance giant, a move that has prompted objections from UC and alarm from patient privacy advocates. The concerns over patient privacy offer a glimpse into questions being raised by healthcare and local government officials about the scope of Blue Shield’s role as an independent overseer of California’s network of COVID-19 vaccine providers, slowing down implementation of the program that Gov. Gavin Newsom unveiled several weeks ago. Counties contacted by The Times said they were still reviewing the contract and declined to comment. Other vaccine providers raised issues with the original contract but declined to speak publicly, citing concerns that doing so could affect future vaccine allotments.

The state’s decision to contract with Blue Shield has prompted questions about how the Oakland-based company, which is a Newsom donor and holds considerable political sway in state politics, landed the contract and what it stands to gain. Blue Shield has pledged to run the distribution programs at or near cost and “will not profit,” according to a letter of intent, and its contract with the state stipulates that the company cannot bill for more than $15 million during the contract term for out-of-pocket costs.

Blue Shield is expected to take full responsibility for vaccine management in the state by March 31. The terms of the contract run until Dec. 31.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; US: California
KEYWORDS: blueshield; california; covid19vaccine; newsom

1 posted on 02/27/2021 6:14:15 PM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Sounds like newsom is looking for a scapegoat.


2 posted on 02/27/2021 6:21:00 PM PST by kvanbrunt2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Blue Shield poking its nose into private affairs? I’m sure they can work something out with UC’s President....Janet Reno.


3 posted on 02/27/2021 6:28:00 PM PST by Rembrandt (-a sure sign a Dem is lying - his lips are moving.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kvanbrunt2

My 1st thought

This fkr is toast when we deliver over 2 million signatures


4 posted on 02/27/2021 6:53:11 PM PST by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me https://youtu.be/wH-pk2vZG2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

I’m not in CA. Why don’t they have 2 mil yet?
Thought Newsome was despised in a bipartisan way.


5 posted on 02/27/2021 7:30:02 PM PST by Adder ("Can you be more stupid?" is a question, not a challenge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Adder

They are checking EVERY DAMN signature with magnifying glasses UNLIKE signatures on voting ballots!!! GO FIGURE rules only come into play when it benefits DEMS!!!


6 posted on 02/27/2021 7:33:03 PM PST by Trump Girl Kit Cat (Yosemite Sam raising hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

He just signed that mail-in vote law.

I don’t think he’s too worried.


7 posted on 02/27/2021 7:38:50 PM PST by mewzilla (Break out the mustard seeds. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rembrandt

I believe that is Napolitano


8 posted on 02/28/2021 12:09:01 AM PST by antceecee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: antceecee

“I believe that is Napolitano”

Maybe


9 posted on 02/28/2021 9:21:05 PM PST by Rembrandt (-a sure sign a Dem is lying - his lips are moving.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

The state’s decision to contract with Blue Shield has prompted questions about how the Oakland-based company, which is a Newsom donor and holds considerable political sway in state politics, landed the contract and what it stands to gain. Blue Shield has pledged to run the distribution programs at or near cost and “will not profit,” according to a letter of intent, and its contract with the state stipulates that the company cannot bill for more than $15 million during the contract term for out-of-pocket costs.

Blue Shield is expected to take full responsibility for vaccine management in the state by March 31. The terms of the contract run until Dec. 31.


10 posted on 03/26/2021 7:10:07 AM PDT by Grampa Dave ("The Covid 19 Circus has run out of acts. It’s time to reopen. It is past time! It’s long overdue! ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson