[Regulator]

The Communist chattering campaign continues.

“Baseless allegations!”

“Debunked falsehoods!”

The new Inquisition. Swear your unwavering belief that JoBlo won it all on pain of death.

[Flick Lives]

“Debunked falsehoods!”

—

I’m still waiting for the prosecution of all those people who swore under oath they witnessed fraud and illegal activity during the election. Should be an easy case for any State prosecutor as the fraud has been “debunked”. Wonder why they are not brought up on charges of lying under oath?

[lasereye]

The Guardian article links to this Reuters article, which claims to debunk the vote spikes in WI, MI, PA. It says the spikes were the result of the heavily Dem areas reporting - but it says they were not 100% for Biden.

Reuters cites 538's website as their source for all numbers.

The posts claim that there was a spike of 1,000,000 mail in votes for Biden in Pennsylvania on the night of Nov. 3 to Nov. 4.

The FiveThirtyEight election blog update at 8:29 a.m. EST on Nov. 4 by Dan Hopkins, which shows a graph of the Pennsylvania vote count on the night of Nov. 3 to Nov. 4 ( here ) does not show a dump of 1 million votes for Biden alone. Between 12 a.m. and 6 a.m. EST the graph says that both Trump and Biden’s votes increased by approximately 1 million. The biggest increase was from midnight to 3 a.m. after which the tallies stayed very stable, not 2:00-4:00 a.m. as the social media posts suggest.

I know (someone correct me if I'm wrong) that as of midnight Trump led by around 700K in PA. The next morning his lead was down to something like 10K votes. Therefore, he and Biden could not have gotten a million each between 12 a.m. and 6 a.m.

The Guardian article says the MI vote spike was the widely reported clerical error. Otherwise, no vote spike.

There was also confusion over the Biden vote count in Michigan during the night of Nov. 3 to Nov. 4, when Biden received 153,710 votes in Shiawassee County, instead of 15,371, meaning his vote count jumped by much more than expected.

This is what they say about WI:

FiveThirtyEight told Reuters that it is not true that Biden received all the votes in the overnight dump: “These batches were NOT 100% Biden votes; behind the blue line, there is also a red line representing the thousands of votes Trump gained. There are also counter examples, where Trump’s line shoots up suddenly when a favorable batch of results are reported.”

Going to their linked 538 web page, I can't find any of the actual numbers they're referring to. It's a social media type of web page with comment after comment in real time.

I have not seen anyone anywhere try to explain the unbelievably high turnout levels in those Dem controlled counties. There is no plausible non-fraud explanation.

[lapsus calami]

 

 

That's the narrative, and they've turned the volume up to 11 which is suspicious. If it's so false and a bunch of nonsense, why all the hysterics to bury it. Saw some news reporter last night editorialize his report with "Trump's discredited claims of vote fraud" - discredited how? And by whom, exactly? They can't say so because it hasn't been. And this was on a local not national news broadcast. Wanted to throw a brick through my TV.