Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: marktwain

The way I understand it, that it was freezing cold and very windy , so that the turbines froze and wouldn’t move. Well that’s one part anyway.


5 posted on 02/20/2021 4:29:03 AM PST by Kaslin (Joe Biden willWe never be my President, and neither will Kamala Harris)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

If I’m understanding the article correctly, it sounds like NATURAL GAS was the bigger problem. In particular, the use of natural gas for both home heating and for electrical power generation is what caused the 1989 situation he describes.


7 posted on 02/20/2021 4:36:20 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("And once in a night I dreamed you were there; I canceled my flight from going nowhere.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
No, the problem was there was no wind.

When the big cold front moved through Texas, behind it followed an enormous pool of very cold air. It was in a high pressure center. Those conditions result in no wind for a period of days. It is common.

Some wind turbines may have froze. The biggest problem was there was no wind to spin the turbines.

Wind stopped producing power.

Then there was a huge demand for power, because of the cold.

The system could not handle it, because, as wind power was relied on for more and more power, not enough reserve capacity in nuclear and fossil fuels was built to compensate for the unreliable wind power.

24 posted on 02/20/2021 5:02:12 AM PST by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson