Posted on 02/18/2021 11:31:29 AM PST by Red Badger
Edited on 02/18/2021 11:33:45 AM PST by Sidebar Moderator. [history]
Democrats have introduced a resolution that would potentially bar President Trump from being buried in the Arlington National Cemetery and prevent federal funds from going to buildings displaying his names for being impeached twice.
(Excerpt) Read more at populist.press ...
I think so, but perhaps they can structure it so it does not qualify.
Or perhaps they will simply ignore its illegality. Leftists are good at that.
That is why they have had him on his heals since before he took office and would not let up the pressure to get him out of office by hook or crook, even if it meant a phony, multi-year Russian collusion investigation, a fake impeachment trial and eventually a setup at the Capitol to charge him with instigating an insurrection so they could charge him with a second faux impeachment charge and trial.
They are so afraid of what he will do, that they are willing to destroying him and his family so badly so he will never, ever be a factor in their town again.
They know that Trump knows where the bodies are buried and they are desperate to get rid of him, muzzle him, destroy him, and obliterate his name from anything in the government.
They don't want to hear from him, see him, allow him around them or the government where he can reveal their corruption and graft.
They want to to make him and his legacy disappear completely.
Methinks they doth protest too much.
Trump Derangement Syndrome knows no bounds. He is living rent free in their heads!
Adolescence...
They all need to be hung and buried in potters field
It doesn’t stop private owners from naming private property, does it?
Milley and the rest of the Pentagon inhabitants are happy with Biden in place. They can get back to their business as usual wars.
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: the Republican impeachment of Bill Clinton was one of the stupidest things they could ever have done. The Presidency and Executive Branch are being destroyed before our eyes ever since. His sex life was disgusting, but none of our business.
How about his lying under oath?
But was she ever?
If I recall, that happened as a result of his giving testimony related to the impeachment itself, which never should have happened in the first place. There are parallels to the persecution of General Flynn for a "process crime" instead of an actual crime. Special Prosecutor Starr's team started out with Clinton's sex life and beat the thing like a dead horse until they finally elicited some legal-sounding tbing to hang the whole political persecution upon.
Make no mistake, I think he was and is a world class scumbag. But the tool of impeachment should properly be limited to acts that actually imperial our Constitution or national defense, which his sex life did not. Dragging all the testimony about oral sex into the public and printed in the daily newspapers had nothing to do with improving the lives of citizens, but actually triggered a drastic spike in oral sex and STDs by teenagers, and did lasting damage by unbalancing relations between the Legislative Branch and the Presidency.
I said it yesterday and I’ll say it again: They will not be satisfied until they can hang Trump upside down from a girder as was done to Mussolini, so they can mutilate his body. And then they’d come after all of us who supported him.
I recall it differently, but am open for correction. I thought it had to do with him lying in a civil case where he was being sued on sexual harassment charges.
It isn’t a resolution it’s a Bill, except Trump was never Impeached, that only occurs if Convicted, he never was convicted so the Bill is faulty from the get go and would be tossed by the USSC no matter what.
Sanchez is pretty dumb.
Right, if that is the case there are a lot of bodies to dig up and move.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.