Posted on 02/18/2021 8:09:46 AM PST by SeekAndFind
It mattered nothing what Trump did, or did not, do. The fix was in. A massive global conspiracy to steal the election. So ubiquitous was the steal that the perps didn't even try to conceal it.
He could have personally found a cure for covid, and Dementia Joe would still have won.
The Deplorables want a Comprehensive Immigration Enforcement bill, missing since 1986 ONE TIME amnesty. Since that amnesty was granted already, a second amnesty is off the table. What remains is the enforcement the Democrats have disallowed since then.
The List of Comprehensive Immigration Enforcement, missing since 1986 goes like this -
1) southern barrier;
2) require eVerify to hire;
3) end all chain migration;
4) birthright per Minor v. Happersett (plural parents);
5) end work visas;
6) 10-year moratorium on all new applications for citizenship (40 years to allow workplace automation effects on downsizing population);
7) Set up an illegal aliens’ victim restitution fund.
Enactment of these provisions will motivate illegal aliens to SELF-deport, and remove colonizadors from our welfare rolls.
When Reagan signed the last Amnesty into law - his biggest mistake of his presidency, IMO - California was and always had been a HUGELY reliable red state. Six years later, it became the most reliable blue state. Those two things were not unrelated.
Six-years after this amnesty, states like Georgia and Texas will become reliably blue, putting national elections out of the grasp of Republicans - or any non-Democrat part - for a generation...probably longer.
It is also very likely to give Democrats something that is very, very close to the permanent 60-vote majority in the Senate. IOW, this is an existential threat to the Republic as it has existed for 240+ years. Who benefits? China.
Great. Bring them all in. Heck, make Honduras and Guatemala states!
Bring it all crashing down, and listen to the liberals cry, like children who touched a hot stove in spite of being told not to, and STILL don’t understand what happened.
11 million is an old number that grossly under counted the number of illegal aliens in the U.S. 10 years ago. The actual number is closer to 30 million now.
Based on what? Congress is well-within its constitutional prerogative to establish the criteria for immigration status and subsequent pathway to citizenship.
What are these lawsuits going to be based upon?
“Trump won college educated voters 47-46. In 2020, Trump lost those voters 48-55, an 8-point negative swing with 40% of the Electorate was fatal to the campaign.”
48-55!? 8-point swing? Trump lost the votes of those who struggle with math?
If both parties would have obeyed the 1986 immigration act, not of this would be happening, but muy votes and cheap labor.
I’ve read it both ways. Especially with respect to the upper midwest.
But in the end, he did win those states: they WERE stolen.
So about all he could have done by going back to immigration and trade as the centerpieces would be to widen the margin even further thus making the Steal harder. I used to think that they would not try it unless they were within 1%. In Pennsylvania they were way below that and still pulled it off.
So Trump would probably point out that we’re both wrong: he got 10 million more then he had before, and no one disputes those were legitimate votes. In the end, criticisms of his campaign are just in the margin. The Elephant in the room is the Steal: it’s the only reason a senile pervert and an alien are in power now.
The only thing we have going for us is there are several key 2022 Senate races which will heavily influence the vote. Rubio would almost certainly be a yes vote for this. But, he knows if he votes for this now, he’s guaranteed to lose his primary challenge. This is why he’s already made several statements in the last 60-days about why immigration can’t be addressed until our unemployment woes are resolved. So, he’s a no vote...right now.
I think it will be close, but I don’t think they’ve got 60-votes in the Senate.
I’ll bet the number rewarded will be at least double. Maybe triple.
Politicians always underestimate the problem and overestimate the benefits.
“Based on what?”
Trump was sued multiple times exercising his constitutional prerogative as PRESIDENT(Executive Branch). It took years in some cases for the SCOTUS to affirm it.
What’s the difference?
I predict it will sail through easily thanks to the RINOs.“
If not this will be what the rats use to end the filibuster.
He won those voters by 1-point in 2016 and then lost those voters by 7-points. That’s an 8-point swing.
What were you saying about math?
You didn’t answer the question. What legal principle will these challenges be based upon?
Get ready for the filibuster to be eliminated, they probably don’t have 60 votes in the Senate when that becomes obvious Schumer will bring up the filibuster and they have the votes to eliminate it
Are there any other countries out there that bring in illegals when every major city & town in the country has a homeless problem? How do the majority not see this as absolutely criminal? These are not scientists, doctors, business people......these are people who will take vastly needed resources that Americans need.
Are there any other countries out there that bring in illegals when every major city & town in the country has a homeless problem? How do the majority not see this as absolutely criminal? These are not scientists, doctors, business people......these are people who will take vastly needed resources that Americans need.
I think there's probably at least 30 million.
Dominion math, naturally.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.