Posted on 02/14/2021 11:50:55 AM PST by spacejunkie2001
The SCOTUS is now scheduled to consider the voter fraud cases for Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Georgia on February 19, 2021.Justices will hear the cases that allege widespread fraud in the 2020 presidential election.Among those to be heard are Republican Rep. Mike Kelly's Pennsylvania election case, pro-Trump lawyer Sidney Powell's Michigan election case, and attorney Lin Wood's Georgia election case. BREAKING: The United States Supreme Court has scheduled the Pennsylvania election case, Sidney Powell's Michigan election case, and Lin Wood's Georgia election case for its February 19 conference— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) February 5, 2021The cases include challenges to the 2020 election results.
When Alito gets 4 others -- and he may already have them after agreeing to this waiting game -- Republican Party PA will reveal PA's election results as patently fraudulent.
Why do you think Nancy she mad? Trump will have his hook into Xiden, into Robotox, after SCOTUS confirms just one case of Democrat election fraud.
Gotta love the future my FRiend. I'm just one of those guys who jumps out of bed every day and can't wait for the day to start.
There ya go. That's what I'm talking about!
[[The Uniparty proved in 2020 that they could rig an election in broad daylight with impunity]]
Right in front of everyone to see plainly what they were doing.
[[and now have to pretend it didn’t happen]]
And attack anyone who claims the election was fraudulent. The left are brainwashing society to think that they didn’t actually see with hteir own eyes what they actually saw-
This is called Gaslighting- Browbeating a person into believing a lie, and into not trusting their own eyes, and consciences and common sense- Browbeat and brainwash the victim so badly that the victim actually breaks down emotionally, and starts to feel sorry for not believing the perpetrators/abusers right from the start-
“Why? What good is it going to do at this point?”
too late - just withdraw and let the thieves continue - next time - why waste the effort (sc)
rt (
What good? Well, I have been saying all along that I would never vote again. Why bother? UNLESS there is serious election reform. The Dems will never enact any on their own. The House might be able to do so if we re-take it in 2022. But, the courts can have a major impact. If they rule that some of the things these states did are unconstitutional, there is hope that they won’t be done again.
[[I’m just one of those guys who jumps out of bed every day and can’t wait for the day to start. ]]
You weirdo! j/k
I hope you’re right-
You’re not wrong. The scotus can not admit what they did in refusing to hear the Texas case. But as someone pointed out previously; Should an election go the other way, the scotus will jump in and overturn an election in favor of the criminals.
Nothings gonna change until a few people go to jail. A LOT of people would be better.
We had both the house and senate at one point, but couldn’t get much passed- apparently- and, if we were to get the house, and senate again- and TRump were president again, many rinos in both would oppose nearly everything he tried to do- too many would side with the democrats-
We’d need a massive super majority to have any chance of getting policy done in house and senate I’m thinking-
Hopefully, the truth will open their eyes as to how bad the steal really was.
Or may justice be applied.
Yeah sure, the lying cowards on the supremes will weasel out.
It is essential that a historical record be assembled. However courts don't exist for that reason. They exist to resolve disputes that, depending on how it's decided, will have some concrete result. This won't have any concrete result. What they are expected to rule in this case: "On a scale of 1 to 10, how bad was the vote fraud?"
Another problem is that they will almost certainly throw out a lot of good evidence as inadmissable in court. I seriously doubt that more than two justices will rule that vote fraud may have changed the result (if that's what they're being asked to rule). The media will exultantly announce that this should end the matter and anyone who doesn't agree is a nut.
The bottom line is, a court is not a way to resolve what is now a historical question.
Define Victory!
“Pray for victory!”
Expect nothing but treachery from the fetid roberts court.
The supremes today advocate for the swamp at the expense of the American people.
Lots of optimism on this thread.
Myself, I smell a setup.
A chance is better than no chance.
See https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3934457/posts
That was my thought. What meaningful relief can SCOTUS grant?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.