Posted on 02/06/2021 7:27:03 AM PST by vharlow
“I agree. In the hands of a good, experienced documentary producer, it could be dynamite. It needs to be scripted, with a good voice-actor doing the narrative, condensed down to about a half our. The real bombshells in the video are almost obscured by the excelsior.”
I DISAGREE! Half of its impact is how passionate and believable Mike is.
Mike is REAL! ANYONE can see that.
People would be more likely to believe some polished actor? (I didn’t say Polish)
In my experience I’ve also found this to be true. Certain close4 family members are like this and one to the extreme. They have to pick apart and slant negative about anything I feel strongly about and wish to share that I watch most things alone anymore. Is it huge ego, personality disorder, mental disorder? I have no idea still.
Bkmk
Anyone who has knowledge of internet network protocols would have been able to figure out that it was impossible for Fanning to obtain that data. It's clearly fraudulent.
Anyone who has knowledge of internet network protocols would have been able to figure out that it was impossible for Fanning to obtain that data. It’s clearly fraudulent.
How so?
“should sue them in return for defamation,”
On War Room today he said that he is suing Dominion, and his lawyers are working on it right now. Defamation was one possibility.
His interviews have been from Palm Beach, so I wonder if he is with PDJT for a while.
good im glad to see that- hope he sues the snot out of them-
Careful. You will be ridiculed for being negative. Can’t allow debate or discussion, constructive or otherwise. Some people are as narrow minded as earth worms. They ate amongst us.
I just noticed that it’ll be on OANN in about 10 minutes, so will watch it then.
Get him to watch the last part where it shows the specific, detailed IP addresses of the hack and what specifically was hacked and at what time. It’s about 10 minutes and the most damning evidence yet of what happened. After see just that part only a fool or a partisan hack would say there’s nothing there
I am very closely acquainted with the owner of a web support company. He is under pressure from his employees to go woke, and drop certain conservative sites the company supports. His co-owner has added to the pressure. He has resisted steadfastly. He is no leftist/lib/RINO/etc.
The only thing really new in the video was the actual data about cyberattacks, beginning at 1:36:00. To me, it’s the most important part of the video. And amazingly, the spreadsheet showed actual data that could be inspected.
So, I asked my close friend to look at it and comment on the information in Mary’s spreadsheet. I asked in as neutral a way as possible, without leading him one way or another.
We spent an hour going over entry after entry. It was not pretty.
* It was rare that the IP address of the terminal being attacked by foreign agents was even in the same county as shown in the spreadsheet.
* None of the IP addresses we looked at had anything to do with voting equipment, vote-counting sites, or government computers.
* Some entries identifying the attacker were MAC addresses (specific machine identification), impossible to be transmitted from a distance such as China, Bulgaria, etc.
* One of the MAC addresses was completely non-identifiable, and a search found it only one time in the entire internet, that being on the website deepcapture.com, where Patrick Byrne is serializing his interactions with President Trump in December 2020.
* My friend’s company’s servers are attacked 10 to 100 thousand times a day, so the number of attacks shown is essentially meaningless.
* The data shown, as it stands, could not allow an observer to know whether votes had been manipulated or not.
There was more. But as the bottom line, my friend — who believes the election was manipulated and/or stolen — reluctantly concluded that the spreadsheet was made up of whole cloth.
Now, if there is someone out there in Free Republic who can rebut the interpretation of these facts, please do. When I saw hard data, I was excited, but I also worked 20 years as a research chemist and wanted to verify that the data said what Mary Fanning said. I was disappointed.
In rebutting, please don’t appeal to Mary Fanning’s expertise, refer to other arguments about fraud, or call names. From screenshots we have a substantial amount of data subject to analysis by our own independent investigators.
Personally, I’m not interested in being “right,” and I’d be pleased to be shown that the presentation in the video is accurate. Show me.
The table of just the various “allegations”of fraud should open anyone’s eyes who has even a small brain.
Thanks as well.
[[After see just that part only a fool or a partisan hack would say there’s nothing there]]
I’m betting roberts, and maybe some others in the Sc says just that IF thsi ever gets to SC
Awaiting replies to your post- but I would think the lawyers on the case are smart enough to connect dots before bringing something that could be easily torn apart in court-
perhaps send your post to lindell’s site, and ask if they have considered these facts, and ask them to explain it perhaps? They might have the answers already- anticipating a court case-
I tried via Lindell’s website. It’s comunicationally opaque.
i doubt it woudl get through to him- but maybe- here’s a contact site/form
https://www.mypillow.com/contact-us
There are a number of red flags, but the first thing that popped out at me was the mac address. It’s quite impossible for anyone to know both the source mac address and target mac address of computers as they are replaced by the mac address of every router along the internet transit path. A monitor program would have to be inside both networks at the same time. There’s much more that indicates it was hand entered.
Very convincing documentation - being repeated every couple of hours on One America News Channel (#347 on Directv)......
G*d Bless OAN.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.