[semimojo]

That's the Navarro Report, what factual reasons do we have to dispute it?

No one has to refute it because it doesn’t really say anything.

”Irregularities” aren’t necessarily fraud and he presents zero evidence that the weaselly worded “potentially illegal ballots” even favored Biden, let alone would have changed the outcome.

[BroJoeK]

"”Irregularities” aren’t necessarily fraud and he presents zero evidence that the weaselly worded “potentially illegal ballots” even favored Biden, let alone would have changed the outcome."

So, what, you're saying there was no fraud and no "potentially illegal ballots"?
And you know this because of... how?