Incorrect. Once this is OVER, and whatever the outcome, Trump can take it up since it is a constitutional issue.
How does one overcome the unanimous Supreme court in (Judge) Nixon, 506 U.S. 224, 234, 235 (1993)? (234) “There are two additional reasons why the Judiciary, and the Supreme Court in particular, were not chosen to have any role in impeachments.” (235) “Judicial involvement in impeachment proceedings, even if only for purposes of judicial review, is counterintuitive because it would eviscerate the ‘important constitutional check’ placed on the Judiciary by the Framers.”
“would eviscerate the ‘important constitutional check’ placed on the Judiciary by the Framers.”
Say what? The framers warned about out of control cabals/factions within the legislature and that is why the court HAS TO address the issue. They are co-equal branches and what this amounts to is a rogue legislature. If not slapped back into place, then we have no republic. Not that we have one left at this moment.