POINT OUT WHERE IT SAYS IT IS LAWFUL TO CERTIFY FRAUDULENT ELECTORS.
But; before we can do this; shouldn't there be some sort of proof that these 'electors' are; indeed; fraudulent?
>>POINT OUT WHERE IT SAYS IT IS LAWFUL TO CERTIFY FRAUDULENT ELECTORS.<<
Well, if you were a leftist (which I’m sure you are not), but pretend you are...you just ignore the constitution and do whatever the hell you wish.
So, you’re a leftist, the slate of electors comes to you as the president of the senate. You are highly politicized. You simply refuse to accept a states electors as a way to circumvent at the very last hour a free and fair election.
This is WHY the framers did not give one man the power to accept or reject a states electors, rather giving each states legislative body this power to thwart any attempt at corruption by just one man.
It is so obvious. If the constitution does not spell out that particular power...you cannot just wish it in. You cannot just say the constitution says something when it is CLEARLY not there.
If you cannot see through your emotions, I’m sorry, but Pence was not the problem...it was the state legislatures.