Posted on 01/24/2021 12:38:59 PM PST by DEPcom
Lin wood listens in on zoom call then stands up for himself.
Time mark 34:06
Lin Wood ask Dean Cathy Cox if Mercer Law School would like to review multi hour interview of a whistleblower that alleges some very bad stuff. Dean Cathy Cox agree to review the video.
Thanks
“Sigh, do I have to append the “< /sarc >” to EVERYthing?”
With something like that, yes. The reason being that most of us read through these posts very quickly and do not pause to fully explore the subtle nuances the poster might have in mind.
Just extrapolating from your summary.....
Well if nothing else, that was a fascinating 45 minutes including the minute of silence at the end. There were quite a few things Wood said for which it certainly wasn’t clear what were connected items and which were standalone. He did come across as being very level headed so for that reason alone, I’m prepared to give his sanity the benefit of the doubt and obviously one shouldn’t be dismissive since it makes sense to hear more about this. Here are my questions for which others here may have heard answers that I did not….
- What was timeframe when the DHS whistleblower came forward? Wood mentioned the year 2017 but it wasn’t clear if that was when the whistleblower came forward or if he was just reporting on what happened that year.
- Did the whistleblower information do a massive information dump in one sitting or was this the result of numerous debriefings over a period of time? Did the whistleblower specifically target Wood to drop the information on to him? Or did Wood get the information second hand….or perhaps he was giving the information to someone else when it was suggested to bring Wood into the loop?
- What was the primary focus of the information that the whistleblower told him? If the timeframe for the whistleblower was recent, one assumes (but not necessarily) that it had to do with election fraud. If the timeframe was earlier, is the focus more on the ‘treasonous acts’ of Rosenstein and Pence in 2017 that he talked about? Or is the focus of the whistleblower the pedophilia that he alluded to that CJ Roberts and others are involved in? Or were all these subjects from the same whistleblower in roughly the same timeframe? It wasn’t clear that election fraud was even part of what the whistleblower dropped…. Which would make sense if the whistleblower interview was some time previously like 2017.
- Wood briefly mentioned assignation attempts on the members of the Supreme Court and it seemed that he mentioned Scalia in almost the same breath. It’s obviously a leap of logic but it certainly seemed to be insinuated that Scalia was murdered.
Yup. We are made for truth. If not received here, in the hereafter.
Just two points totally my opinion
1. No clue on whistle-blower - I took it that this stuff was presented to him after the election and it seemed like a deposition type of hours-long sit-down that happened recently.
It indeed sounds explosive. I will say this - you can dismiss me out of hand, but - BUT - the two men of God that I see having very humble yet profound spiritual ears of what God is about to do, have both prophesied or someone trusted in their circle prophesied that the level of corruption and wickedness going to be exposed will shock the nation - and some of the things said were very similar to what Lin has eluded to here. So things to me seem to be lining up.
2. I do believe that Scalia was assassinated. The timing and circumstances were the most odd at the time, and Obama’s hand was in it. My opinion.
WOW! Just watched/listened to it ALL!
OMG, (is that still okay?)
All you people who have been dumping on Lin Wood MUST listen to this audio.
May God bless Lin Wood! How he kept his anger in check is amazing. I couldn’t have done so.
He was masterful, off the cuff, hit every point.
I BELIEVE HIM 100%.
NO MORE TRASHING LIN WOOD! PLEASE!
I can’t watch “Gone With The Wind” could you give me a summary?
My computer is broke and I can’t play “Stairway to Heaven” can you give me a summary?
I can’t watch the movie “Titanic” can you give me a summary? “Tell me” all about the underwater scenes of the REAL Titanic.
Sometimes a “summary” doesn’t cut it.
Good explanation for those TOO LAZY to listen to it themselves.
BUT, I couldn’t ascertain the “Tone” of Lin Wood’s voice in your text.
Punk Mercer law school students are worried about how the School reputation will reflect upon them.
1) They should be worried their personal lack of effort is not accumulating sufficent knowledge to become a Lawyer.
2) I think the cowards at Mercer ended the call before Lin finished making his arguement.
3) Mercer Law school is full of children who should not be hired on in the real world
Maybe sharing it with other “lawyers” is a “thing”.
“I knew that of course. Sigh, do I have to append the “< /sarc >” to EVERYthing?”
YES!!! EVERY time or “someone” will take it series.
“LOL. No he’s seriously mentally ill. Just ask his former law partners and children.”
YOU didn’t listen to it, OBIOUSLY!
“Well, Lin Wood’s standing isn’t quite as pristine as it used to be. LOL”
It SHOULD be. This audio PROVES IT!
> Sometimes a “summary” doesn’t cut it. <
You’re right. But more often than not, a summary can quite helpful to the reader.
Think about it for a moment. A summary of “Stairway to Heaven” would tell you that it’s a classic hard/folk rock song. So if you’re interested in traditional Christian music, that summary would save you some time. You’d probably take a pass on that song.
It’s no big deal. It’s just a courtesy. No big deal.
Never defame a defamatory attorney. Lol.
Series? I can tell you’ve been around awhile. .... Yes, this is hughly series.
“Liars, frauds, charlatans like wood are everyone’s problem. people that mindlessly follow liars, frauds, and charlatans are also everyone’s problem.”
In the new spirit proposed by Jim Robinson, I won’t call you a name that starts with “A” and ends with “E” (7 letters in total).
But you certainly DESERVE IT!
Moving on, not responding to you, ignoring you, wishing you rainbows and unicorns.
“Reading is faster for most than listening or watching.”
Is “reading” music the same as listening to it?
SUPER calm. SUPER in-control, collected, listening to attacks spewed and picks up false statements, as I would expect a seasoned lawyer to be able to expertly do.
Not arrogant at all, but very confident, sure of himself and what he knows and his faith in God. Even when they brought up the children’s smears, discrediting him, he politely explained exactly what/how Jesus said would be with family’s inter-personal angst.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.