Just extrapolating from your summary.....
Well if nothing else, that was a fascinating 45 minutes including the minute of silence at the end. There were quite a few things Wood said for which it certainly wasn’t clear what were connected items and which were standalone. He did come across as being very level headed so for that reason alone, I’m prepared to give his sanity the benefit of the doubt and obviously one shouldn’t be dismissive since it makes sense to hear more about this. Here are my questions for which others here may have heard answers that I did not….
- What was timeframe when the DHS whistleblower came forward? Wood mentioned the year 2017 but it wasn’t clear if that was when the whistleblower came forward or if he was just reporting on what happened that year.
- Did the whistleblower information do a massive information dump in one sitting or was this the result of numerous debriefings over a period of time? Did the whistleblower specifically target Wood to drop the information on to him? Or did Wood get the information second hand….or perhaps he was giving the information to someone else when it was suggested to bring Wood into the loop?
- What was the primary focus of the information that the whistleblower told him? If the timeframe for the whistleblower was recent, one assumes (but not necessarily) that it had to do with election fraud. If the timeframe was earlier, is the focus more on the ‘treasonous acts’ of Rosenstein and Pence in 2017 that he talked about? Or is the focus of the whistleblower the pedophilia that he alluded to that CJ Roberts and others are involved in? Or were all these subjects from the same whistleblower in roughly the same timeframe? It wasn’t clear that election fraud was even part of what the whistleblower dropped…. Which would make sense if the whistleblower interview was some time previously like 2017.
- Wood briefly mentioned assignation attempts on the members of the Supreme Court and it seemed that he mentioned Scalia in almost the same breath. It’s obviously a leap of logic but it certainly seemed to be insinuated that Scalia was murdered.
Just two points totally my opinion
1. No clue on whistle-blower - I took it that this stuff was presented to him after the election and it seemed like a deposition type of hours-long sit-down that happened recently.
It indeed sounds explosive. I will say this - you can dismiss me out of hand, but - BUT - the two men of God that I see having very humble yet profound spiritual ears of what God is about to do, have both prophesied or someone trusted in their circle prophesied that the level of corruption and wickedness going to be exposed will shock the nation - and some of the things said were very similar to what Lin has eluded to here. So things to me seem to be lining up.
2. I do believe that Scalia was assassinated. The timing and circumstances were the most odd at the time, and Obama’s hand was in it. My opinion.