A Nursing Home had Zero Coronavirus Deaths. Then, It Vaccinates Residents for Coronavirus and the Deaths Begin.

Ron Paul Institute ^ | 01/10/2021 | Adam Dick

[Jan_Sobieski]

Things seem to be working backwards at The Commons on St. Anthony nursing home in Auburn, New York. Vaccinating people is supposed to reduce or end coronavirus deaths. Right? But, at The Commons, such deaths are reported to have occurred only after residents began receiving coronavirus vaccinations.

James T. Mulder wrote Saturday at syracuse.com that until December 29 there had been no coronavirus deaths at The Commons. December 29, when deaths of residents with coronavirus began occurring at The Commons, is also, Mulder’s article discloses, seven days days after the nursing home began giving coronavirus vaccinations to residents, with 80 percent of residents so far having been vaccinated.

Over a period of less than two weeks since December 29, Mulder relates that 24 coronavirus-infected residents at the 300-bed nursing home have died.

Is the timing just a strange coincidence?

Read Mulder’s article here.

This is the penultimate paragraph of Mulder’s article, where vaccinations at The Commons is mentioned:

The nursing home began vaccinating residents Dec. 22. So far 193 residents, or 80%, and 113 employees, or less than half the staff, have been vaccinated. The nursing home plans to do more vaccinations Jan. 12.

[2aProtectsTheRest]

So much for personal choice, right?

Anti-vaxxers always scream and cry about personal choice. Right up until somebody makes a choice they don’t like. Then it’s all “she was a fool” and “shame on you”, etc.

Educating her? 18% Infection Fatality Rate for a woman that age if she gets COVID-19. 18%. Chance of death from the vaccine? So far, 0. Out of 30.5 million doses given in 43 countries, including 10 million doses in just the US. 0.

Educate yourself.

[dynoman]

LOL!! It’s CDC.

[dynoman]

Directly from the link you posted;
“During December 14–23, 2020, monitoring by the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System [VAERS} detected 21 cases of anaphylaxis”

I ran a report and VAERS says;
ANAPHYLACTIC REACTION 30
ANAPHYLACTIC SHOCK 1

Pretty close.

[RinaseaofDs]

There are plenty of cases of this vaccine having pretty serious side effects. Rate is somewhere between 1/12 to 1/16 having them.

This feels like human experimentation to me.

[mdmathis6]

No reports of anything adverse at my hospital or in the unit I work in...sore arms for about 2 days, achy joints, malaise but then better by 3 days is the worst that we’ve seen here. No one with petechial reactions and loss of platelets like that one doctor who passed away. We had some get COVID but they’d just had their first shot so the immunity had not built up when they got sick.They are better now.

[2aProtectsTheRest]

The system is hosted by CDC.

The reports can be made by anyone who visits that link and submits a report. You can submit a report. Go to the link and see for yourself.

[2aProtectsTheRest]

From CDC (as of January 6th): “Four (19%) patients were hospitalized (including three in intensive care), and 17 (81%) were treated in an emergency department; 20 (95%) are known to have been discharged home or had recovered at the time of report to VAERS. No deaths from anaphylaxis were reported after receipt of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. Seventeen (81%) of 21 patients with anaphylaxis had a documented history of allergies or allergic reactions, including to drugs or medical products, foods, and insect stings; seven (33%) patients had experienced an episode of anaphylaxis in the past, including one after receipt of a rabies vaccine and another after receipt of an influenza A(H1N1) vaccine” - https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7002e1.htm

Again: “No deaths from anaphylaxis were reported after receipt of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.”

Further, 30 cases of reactions out of 30.5 million doses = 1 in a million.

Chance of death from COVID-19 infection: 1 in 154. Chance of ICU admittance from COVID-19 infection: 1 in 33. Chance of hospitalization from COVID-19 infection: 1 in 20.

Using the numbers we have today, this fear over the vaccine is absurd.

[dynoman]

It says right on the reporting link;

“Warning: Knowingly filing a false VAERS report with the intent to mislead the Department of Health and Human Services is a violation of Federal law (18 U.S. Code § 1001) punishable by fine and imprisonment.”

You act as if tons of people are filling out false reports which obviously isn’t the case.

[dynoman]

No deaths from anaphylaxis.

Not no deaths.

If you run a VAERS report you will see there have been a lot of adverse reactions, adverse reactions aren’t limited to only anaphylaxis. I don’t know why you are so zeroed in on only that reaction.

Bottom line is you take the vaccine if your want. I really don’t care if you do or don’t. I won’t be taking it. Both my wife and I have worked normally though the “pandemic” without a problem. If we had covid it was very mild. We both have had multiple covid symptoms but never tested positive.

[dynoman]

Reference to post 103;

CDC still says 94% of “covid” deaths are covid + 2.9% comorbidities. 6% are covid only.

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm

[2aProtectsTheRest]

Bad intent isn’t required. You can have good intentions, but bad information or simply bad conclusions. Further, simple temporal correlation is enough to trigger a required reporting from healthcare workers.

That’s why the entire VAERS system is wallpapered with warnings that all the data in there is unverified. It’s a system for anyone and everyone to be able to file reports. That can be you who gets a Whooping Cough vaccine and then experiences flu-like symptoms (because you got the flu) and reports it. Or it can be an upset parent who blames their child’s autism on every vaccine under the sun. Any number of things.

That’s why the VAERS system has warnings on nearly every single page in the VAERS system telling you NOT to rely on the data in the VAERS system as factual or indicating any causal link with any vaccine. The people who run the system are telling you not to rely on the data in that system. What does that tell you?

[dynoman]

Then why does CDC run VAERS?

Again you act as if no reports on VAERS can be trusted, yet it's used by health care professionals. Why? Because you can be prosecuted for filing a false report. As to the vaccine deaths and other serious adverse reactions reported there you have absolutely no proof any are fraudulent reports.

[2aProtectsTheRest]

"We don’t know what long term effects of the mRNA vaccines will be."

This is pure FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt) through insinuation. The fact is, mRNA vaccines have been in development for decades. Moderna was specifically created over 10 years ago explicitly and exclusively to bring mRNA vaccines to market. That's their whole purpose, and they've been doing research and testing throughout that time. Other big pharma and biotech companies have been doing the same thing for a lot longer. This technology is new to market, but it's not new technology.

"why didn’t Moderna and Pfizer accept legal liability for their vaccines if they are so safe?"

Because that isn't their choice. Congress removed the jurisdiction of US courts to hear vaccine injury cases by law in 1986 with the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. There is literally nothing that Moderna or Pfizer or anyone except Congress can do to alter the jurisdiction of US courts. Moderna can't tell a court to take a case it explicitly lacks the jurisdiction to hear. They're a biotech company; not gods.

Bringing this up is a common anti-vaxxer tactic and they always make it sound like it's some new thing that just sprang up with the invention of the mRNA vaccine. It isn't. Congress did this 34 years ago because anti-vaxxers were launching so many nuisance suits against vaccine makers that the vaccine makers were going to go out of business. This is because anti-vaxxers are anti-choice. They claim they just want to be left alone, but what they really want is the entire vaccine industry destroyed. They want choice gone. Except their choice to not take vaccines. That's a "choice" they'll allow others to have. But the choice to take a vaccine? They want that gone.

Congress didn't want polio and pertussis and other horrible diseases to come back, so they removed the jurisdiction of the courts and created the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program and made it incredibly easy to get compensation. They require no medical proof that a vaccine caused your injury. All you need to do is show that you have an injury, it happened some time after you got a vaccine, and provide some sort of plausible explanation for how the two are connected. If you can meet that ridiculously low bar, you get paid. How much? Average of six-figures. Up to $500,000 AVERAGE in some years.

And with that ridiculously low bar, and that insanely high payout, how often are people cashing in? About one payout per 1 million vaccinations.

"The exact same cause/effect argument could be used for covid itself, with the CDC reported fact that 94% of “covid” deaths were covid + an average of 2.6 comorbidities. Just because those 96% had covid when they died doesn’t mean they died from covid.

This old line about "died with COVID vs died from COVID" is really really old. Doctors sign death certificates. Have you looked at a US Standard Certificate of Death before? Look in Section 32 Part I. In Part I, the underlying cause of death (UCOD) is the bottom line filled out and the immediate cause of death is the top line filled out. Underlying cause of death is the disease or injury which initiated the chain of morbid events leading directly to death. Immediate cause of death is the final straw. For a cancer patient, they might list pancreatic cancer as the last line (underlying cause of death), one or two things where it escalated, and then acute renal failure in the top line as the immediate cause of death. This is a cancer death; no matter what's listed in the middle. Cancer caused the death. For a flu patient, you might see Influenza infection as the UCoD, then pneumonia, then hypoxemia as the immediate cause of death. This is a flu death. No matter what else happened to complicate things, flu began the chain of events.

Now look at Section 32 Part II. This is for significant conditions contributing to death, but which are NOT part of the chain of events leading from the underlying cause of death to the immediate cause of death. For our cancer patient, they may have had diabetes, congestive heart failure, and other issues. Some of these might complicate treatment. Some of them might just make it harder for the patient to fight the disease. For our flu patient, they might also have diabetes, or they might have hypertension, or other things. Part II is the stuff you've been dealing with all along. They didn't result in the UCoD. They didn't initiate the chain of events leading to death. If you have diabetes for 20 years and you die from metastatic breast cancer, that doesn't get listed as diabetes. And it doesn't make it any less a breast cancer death.

Now let's talk about COVID-19 and the CDC stats you're referencing. The CDC reported that 94% had some stuff listed in Part II of their death certificate. Who cares. The 6% who didn't have anything listed? That means they were otherwise believed to be healthy, normal individuals before they got COVID-19 and died. If you've had diabetes for 20 years and hypertension for 15 years, then you get COVID-19, develop pneumonia as a result, and die in 3 weeks, diabetes didn't kill you. It might have complicated your treatment and made it more difficult for you to survive, but it didn't kill you.

COVID-19 does a number of things to people. The most obvious is that it can basically sandblast the epithelial lining (protective barrier) of your lungs, leaving you very exposed to any random pneumonia that happens to be present or introduced. Pneumonia leads to further issues, and eventually the patient dies. What disease or injury initiated the chain of events leading directly to death? COVID-19. Other impacts from COVID-19 infection include significant blood clotting damage to various tissues, cytokine storm (uncontrolled inflammatory response from the immune system), and other problems. Each of those can lead to death. Each of those begins with COVID-19.

The doctors filling out these death certificates are not idiots and they are not risking medical malpractice lawsuits, Federal fraud charges, the loss of their medical licenses, the loss of their careers, the loss of their sole source of income, and the loss of their freedom trying to sneak a fast one in by falsifying 400,000 death certificates.

"160K die every year from “chronic lower respiratory diseases” every year, well, except for 2020!"

All other causes of death were at or slightly above normal levels in 2020:

But just the same, there's a huge spike in deaths for 2020 (~400,000):

So if deaths for all the regular things are at normal levels and deaths overall are way over normal (2,855,000 in 2019 vs 3,255,331 in 2020), and every doctor on Earth is talking about losing patients to COVID-19, it doesn't take a rocket surgeon to figure out what's going on.

I hope you're reading through what I'm sending you because it seems like you are coming at this from a genuine place. So if I can help you to understand why the numbers make sense, that's worthwhile. The sooner we can all agree the numbers are what they are, the sooner we can start asking the real questions. Such as why governors like Cuomo and Newsom (among others) forced nursing homes to accept known-infected COVID-19 patients, knowing that would kill tens of thousands unnecessarily. Why they made zero effort to protect the elderly, particularly those who have very limited mobility and options to protect themselves. Why Newsom chose to spend over $800 million taking homeless people from the outdoors (low risk of COVID-19 transmission per CDC) and putting them up in hotels (indoors, high risk of COVID-19 transmission per CDC). And dozens of other questions that add up to tens - if not hundreds - of thousands of unnecessary deaths.

These people should be on trial for criminally negligent homicide. But if we just sit here arguing over whether the numbers are perfect, or whether anyone's dying at all, then we never get there. We need to move past the nonsense and get to the serious business of holding these people accountable for their criminally negligent homicides.

[2aProtectsTheRest]

Well here's what CDC says about why they run VAERS and how the data should be used:

[2aProtectsTheRest]

In case it’s not clear, I did the highlighting. Those are the main points.

[dynoman]

LOL!! Like I was suspecting, you act as if pro-vaccine dogma is your religion.

Take the vaccine if you want. I won’t.

End of discussion.

[2aProtectsTheRest]

My faith is my only religion. Facts are my dogma. That’s why I include them and link back to authoritative sources in order to back them up. I’ve linked back to the US Health Resources & Services Administration, the CDC, and others. I’ve tried to provide you with the facts only to educate you because you seemed genuinely interested in getting to the truth.

Whether you take the vaccine or not is 100% your choice. I support your right to make your choice.

[Triple]

Science is on my side.

[dynoman]

Scholarly study done on vaccine deaths using VAERS;

https://europepmc.org/article/pmc/pmc6771280

[dynoman]

“San Diego Vaccination Super Station” event goes terribly wrong as many Moderna vaccine recipients are carted away in ambulances following vaccine injury. Eyewitnesses report far more injuries than the “6” mentioned in the story. @SupFletcher is to blame.

https://t.co/FfTnSFKJJ6

https://twitter.com/uTobian/status/1349631171496271872?s=19