Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: entropy12

[He who keeps finding last batch of votes will always win because he knows how many fraud ballots are needed to win.]


If unlimited vote fraud were possible, they’d have gotten super-majorities every chance they could. They’d be tossing conservatives in gulags. There are limits, and the more of it they do, the greater the chance of discovery.

Dan Patrick, Lt Governor-TX, offered $1m for evidence of vote fraud that will stand up in court. You know what people in the areas that do this kind of stuff would do for $1m, now? They’d sell their own mothers. It’s likely that it’s very distributed, with no one knowing of an overall coordinator.


36 posted on 01/10/2021 10:14:15 PM PST by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Zhang Fei

If I was involved in witnessing election fraud in 2020, I would not come forward for mere $1 Million. First it is not guaranteed prize, the fraud has to go to court and win. Not many courts are even accepting election fraud cases.

$1 million in today’s price structure does not make you secure. You will need at least $4 million plus to go live in obscurity without needing a job and get discovered. The list of people associated with Clinton’s who died unnatural deaths is more than 100 names.


52 posted on 01/11/2021 7:47:21 AM PST by entropy12 (It is NOT WHO VOTES, it is who COUNTS THE VOTES, become the rulers...I think Stalin said that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson