Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/05/2021 3:11:15 PM PST by RandFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: RandFan

I will be speaking at the SAVE AMERICA RALLY tomorrow on the Ellipse at 11AM Eastern. Arrive early — doors open at 7AM Eastern. BIG CROWDS! pic.twitter.com/k4blXESc0c— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 5, 2021


2 posted on 01/05/2021 3:12:20 PM PST by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RandFan

The date is set by law. Pence can’t just ignore it.


3 posted on 01/05/2021 3:12:27 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RandFan; All
I wonder if these 100+ state legislators are reminding VP Pence of his constitutionally enumerated duty to guarantee each state a republican form of government which includes guaranteeing vote-counting integrity imo.
"Article IV, Section 4: The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government [emphasis added], and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence."

4 posted on 01/05/2021 3:16:54 PM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RandFan

Bttt.

5.56mm


12 posted on 01/05/2021 3:28:59 PM PST by M Kehoe (DRAIN THE SWAMP! Finish THE WALL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RandFan

Joint resolutions passed by majorities could (possibly) accomplish this.

Discontented minority appeals? No chance.


13 posted on 01/05/2021 3:29:27 PM PST by Jim Noble (Lo there do I see the line of my people, back to the beginning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RandFan

All this does is ask for more time for a committee to review info. The lawyers have more than enough proof of fraud right now for Pence to act tomorrow when debates are finished.

The committee members will be appointed by McConnell and Pelosi, and we know they’ll stack it against Trump. At least that was the setup when this when this came up a few days ago.


16 posted on 01/05/2021 3:31:42 PM PST by MayflowerMadam (I'd rather have Covid-19 than Biden-20.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RandFan

It would be a shame if water main broke in the Capitol - happens all the time. Why back in November the same thing happened in Atlanta ....


20 posted on 01/05/2021 3:39:05 PM PST by ElkGroveDan (My tagline is in the shop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
President Trump won on election day, Nov 3rd this last time around.

Votes can not be counted on Nov 4th, Nov 14th or Dec 4th.

Any vote counted after "election day" is ILLEGAL. A unanimous SCOTUS decision confirms this.

We have an election "day," not an election "days" or "weeks" or "months.'

Election Day.

"At midnight on the evening of November 3, and as illustrated in Table 1, President Trump was ahead by more than 110,000 votes in Wisconsin and more than 290,000 votes in Michigan. In Georgia, his lead was a whopping 356,945; and he led in Pennsylvania by more than half a million votes. By December 7, however, these wide Trump leads would turn into razor thin Biden leads – 11,779 votes in Georgia, 20,682 votes in Wisconsin, 81,660 votes in Pennsylvania, and 154,188 votes in Michigan."

 

SCOTUS 9-0: Election Day Is One Single Day. Listen to oral argument from Foster v. Love (1997)
https://freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3914566/posts

 

Questions regarding "early voting," which is legal, are answered in post #16.

24 posted on 01/05/2021 3:42:22 PM PST by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RandFan
"

LOOKING PAST JANUARY 6th

Now let’s look past January 6th. And let’s imagine that the United States Supreme Court issues an order after its January 8, 2021 conference, stating that no votes in Pennsylvania can be counted which arrived after the time set by its Legislature for the Presidential Election to end, which was 8 P.M., Nov. 3rd. And let’s assume that two other states see their results overturned by their Legislatures, or the Supreme Court, after January 6th, but before January 20th? What happens then?

Read the Twentieth Amendment, § 3:

“If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President elect shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President…”

That’s the Constitution of the United States, folks. Nobody knows what that means, because the United States Supreme Court hasn’t fully interpreted Section 3 yet.

But understand this: the Pennsylvania GOP case has been “DISTRIBUTED for conference 01/08/2021" at SCOTUS. So maybe the Court will interpret Section 3 soon enough. Until January 20th, high noon, we are in muddy Constitutional waters.

LOOKING PAST JANUARY 20th

After a wrongful election, where one candidate takes office, there’s always the possibility of a Writ of Quo Warranto. Some have argued that only impeachment and conviction in the Senate can remove a sitting President President. But if you get a Writ of Quo Warranto issued, that means the White House occupant it’s issued against was never actually President. Their holding the Office of President becomes a nullity. The person has not technically been “removed” from office, but rather, a Writ of Quo Warranto acts as if that person was never President to begin with.

There is a line of cases that issue Writs of Quo Warranto for false election results caused by fraudulent or faulty tabulation machines, after the wrong person takes office:

“Challenges to the outcome of a general election based upon alleged voting machine malfunctions necessarily fall within the purview of quo warranto.” Matter of Delgado v. Sunderland, 97 N.Y. 2d 420 (2002), 767 N.E. 2d 662.

Here is the federal Quo Warranto statute:

“A quo warranto may be issued from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in the name of the United States against a person who within the District of Columbia usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully holds or exercises, a franchise conferred by the United States or a public office of the United States, civil or military.”

If President Trump has the will to keep fighting, then this horrific saga in United States election history still has a very long road to go before the final result is determined."

https://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2020/12/20/the-arizona-state-legislature-must-invoke-nuclear-option-to-choose-electors-since-subpoena-was-ignored/

30 posted on 01/05/2021 3:48:41 PM PST by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RandFan

l8r


46 posted on 01/05/2021 4:23:04 PM PST by preacher ( Journalism no longer reports news, they use news to shape our society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RandFan
or whether such a manuever would be deemed constitutional by the Supreme Court

The SC that has ruled that no one has standing.

59 posted on 01/05/2021 5:20:28 PM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RandFan

bump


66 posted on 01/05/2021 9:55:09 PM PST by CPT Clay (Q sent me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson