I disagree with my FRiends that he’s “going nuts”. I believe his language is crafted to reach maximum levels. Is Wood an opportunist? I don’t know. Does he love the Country to the point of jeopardizing his personal freedoms? I don’t know. But is his rhetoric that much different than that heralded by Washington’s contemporaries?
It’s necessary to mention that I respect Mike Pence. I pray for the well-being of him and his loved one’s, and will continue to do so regardless of the outcomes that lie ahead.
In the context of this Constitutional battle, I don’t find Wood’s rhetoric alarming. I’m more concerned about its dismissal for reasons of the decorum we’re used to.
Singling out individuals certainly pushes the envelope of acceptable rhetoric, but what does it mean to you when condemning Wood for his stated, alarming consequences that would stem from losing the Country?
My logic right below your post is very similar to yours. And I had not read your post. Our logic is very strong here.