My logic right below your post is very similar to yours. And I had not read your post. Our logic is very strong here.
what logic? You claimed he didn’t say things he in fact said.
I have no reservations about gratuitous castigation — it’s fun, therapeutic, and meant without personal injury. But I hit the pause button when there’s an unexplained deviation. And ironically, the castigation that follows often becomes more interesting than the deviation. Wood’s recent histrionics are the deviation du jour.
I’m friendly with the vast majority of FReepers, and I respect their views — not interested in starting nor engaging in puerile arguments. But I am curious about the dissenting perspectives as I often fail to understand the rationale. I suppose my ambivalence towards Wood’s remarks could be considered equally as enigmatic.
I noticed you started trouble upthread, and that doesn’t come for free — lol.