Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MOTION OF DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, TO INTERVENE IN HIS PERSONAL CAPACITY AS CANDIDATE FOR RE-ELECTION, PROPOSED BILL OF COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION, AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO INTERVENE
SCOTUS ^ | 12/9/2020

Posted on 12/09/2020 1:23:20 PM PST by tarpit

Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, respectfully seeks leave to intervene in the pending original jurisdiction matter of State of Texas v. Com-monwealth of Pennsylvania,et al., No. 22O155 (filed Dec. 7, 2020). Plaintiff in Intervention seeks leave to file the ac-companying Bill of Complaint in Intervention against the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the States of Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin (“Defendant States”), challenging their administration of the 2020 presidential election.

(Excerpt) Read more at supremecourt.gov ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Government
KEYWORDS: lawsuit; pennsylvania; q; scotus; scotustexas; scotustexastrump; scotustrump; texas; texasvsstates
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-251 last
To: KevinB

Thanks for the clarification. You might wish to call the posts negative. Based on what I am reading, I prefer the term reality.


241 posted on 12/10/2020 5:03:56 PM PST by hawkaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: StAnDeliver

“The Supreme Court will not take up this case because something should have done months earlier.”

That is a valid concern.

Except for one thing. The Illegal votes were not committed yet.. It took the election for the illegal votes to be unconstitutional!!


242 posted on 12/10/2020 5:18:27 PM PST by tallyhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: tarpit

This will be a tough case for the Supreme Court. They have to decide between two bad precedents, neither of which they want to occur: allowing democrats to run a coup d’etat against a president through vote fraud and breaking election laws, or getting the court seriously involved in presidential elections by throwing out the fraudulent vote counts in four states and directing the state legislatures to choose a group of presidential electors for each state. They really don’t want either precedent to be set, but they’re going to have to choose one.

As unlikely as it appears now, the court may decide that the precedent of a blatantly stolen presidential election is worse than the court effectively deciding the election. That means there’s a significant chance that they will throw out the election results from the four defendant states and send it to the state legislatures to choose a group of presidential electors, and all four legislatures are controlled by Republicans. This means Trump would win the election if the fraudulent vote counts are thrown out. This could happen, because a presidential election stolen through fraud and lawbreaking sets such a terrible precedent, and could lead to a series of stolen elections and a descent of the USA into a corrupt one-party system. A blatantly stolen presidential election in 2020 could be the end of a functional constitutional republic in the USA. So this is an extremely important court case, perhaps the most important SCOTUS case in history, and I think the courts knows this. So this case could go either way, and I sure hope Texas and the other states win this case.


243 posted on 12/10/2020 5:42:22 PM PST by socialism_stinX (That socialist dog don't hunt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StAnDeliver

Yes we do!


244 posted on 12/11/2020 7:57:21 AM PST by mr_hammer (A man becomes truly great when he realizes who always walks beside him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: MalPearce
There doesn’t need to be an injured party if the argument is that the action violated express terms of the constitution. Illegal changes to the rules could’ve hurt any candidate in any party by any scale. The outcome was irrelevant. There’s a rule, here’s it broken. End of argument.

The minute you claim targeted victimhood you invoke habeas corpus, and have to prove the injury. No proof of injury + no conclusive proof of illegality = uphill battle to get the case heard.

As I believe Eastman was saying, the suit does show lots of evidence of probable fraud (and thus "victimhood"). But since the defendants increased the risk of fraud when they illegally changed the rules, it's up to the defendants to prove that there was no fraud, which of course is impossible to prove, especially given the massive amount of substantive evidence.

So I think there does need to be a possible injured party, else the SC would think that there is no need to issue a remedy, or even take the case. But there doesn't have to be conclusive proof of that fraud.

245 posted on 12/11/2020 11:50:51 AM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: All

When will we hear their decision? Any guesses?


246 posted on 12/11/2020 3:18:36 PM PST by Fawn ("My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge" Hosea 4:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: tarpit

It’s It’s Donald Trump / Lyn Wood in Supreme Court and Texas is out I thought. Kinda like all the soldiers who were afraid to face the giant but David faced the giant alone and cut off his head. God is with us.


247 posted on 12/11/2020 4:08:35 PM PST by Linda Frances (Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Linda Frances

Linda this was focused on Texas v PA et al. I am thankful to everyone for helping me present both sides of the arguments. I am especially thankful to the professors for their input. They called it correct.


248 posted on 12/11/2020 4:17:22 PM PST by tarpit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: Fawn

The fourth box of Liberty.


249 posted on 12/11/2020 5:58:15 PM PST by gdc61 (LOL not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: tarpit
Can someone translate this into plain English?

Thanks in advance.

250 posted on 12/16/2020 7:33:22 AM PST by Pajamajan ( PRAY FOR OUR NATION. I will never be a p£peaceful slave in a new Socialist America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tarpit
Donald Trump won the 2020 election. God is testing all Judges, Senators, Congressman, State officials, Government leaders, all people in any position of responsibility. God in heaven is using this election to see who is honest and moral and who is evil and immoral. God is giving all Americans a chance to show which path they chose. God is separating the wheat from the chaff and the goats from the lambs. All the lying, cheating, dishonesty, corruption, deceit, are known by God and all will come to light. Operation HO Ho Ho is underway and by Christmas many things hidden will become clear and the media and government will no longer be able to hide from the light. Have faith and know that God is in heaven and Jesus has conqurred sin and death and a savior is born. Haleluea and praise God.

Merry Christmas

Amen...

251 posted on 12/18/2020 10:47:13 PM PST by Mat_Helm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-251 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson