MOTION OF DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, TO INTERVENE IN HIS PERSONAL CAPACITY AS CANDIDATE FOR RE-ELECTION, PROPOSED BILL OF COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION, AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO INTERVENE

SCOTUS ^ | 12/9/2020

[Fawn]

May the Lord God look over us and forgive us our sins.

We have a cruel God....

[Fawn]

Can you explain that please?

[tarpit]

Texas filed suit against PA et al. President Trump filed to intervene which means he is requesting to be a party to complaint. Missouri at 16 states files motions in support of Texas, but not to be a party to the complaint itself. Then Missouri and 6 other states filed to intervene so that they could be a party to the case. The current list of motions is:

Filed By	Description	Document
Texas v PA, et al	Motion for leave to file a bill of complaint filed.	source
President Trump	To Intervene	source
Missouri +16 states	In support of Texas	source
Carter Phillips etc al	In Support of Defendants	source
Constitutional Attorneys	In Support of Plaintiff	source
Arizona	In Support of Plaintiff	source
Missouri et al	To Intervene	source
Ohio	In Support of Nobody	source

[tarpit]

To more correctly answer your question, you will notice that one filing (so far) is in support of the Defendants. I am sure more will follow.

[Son House]

Thanks, also the Mathematician Piton has more results, now that they know the pattern it’ll be easier to find in the data;
https://twitter.com/BobbyPiton3/status/1337029460873326592
Quote

“Absolutely Outstanding breakthroughs in identifying #PhantomSleeperVoters across AZ and a Congressional Race in PA.”
End Quote

[Miss Didi]

🚨🚨🚨

BREAKING: PENNSYLVANIA, GEORGIA, MICHIGAN, AND WISCONSIN RESPOND TO MOTION FILED BY TEXAS IN US SUPREME COURT

LINK: https://t.co/F8VC2OCpxx pic.twitter.com/fKkjaGxuq8— anonymous patriot 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 (@anonpatriotq) December 10, 2020

[Fawn]

ty

[mmercier0921]

“You can’t handle the truth”

It happens.

[tarpit]

This is the updated list of SCOTUS motions in Texas vs PA, GA, MI, and WI. Towards the bottom is the Response of Commonwealth.

Filed By	Description	Document
Texas v PA, et al	Motion for leave to file a bill of complaint filed.	source
President Trump	To Intervene	source
Missouri +16 states	In support of Texas	source
Carter Phillips etc al	In Support of Defendants	source
Constitutional Attorneys	In Support of Plaintiff	source
Arizona	In Support of Plaintiff	source
Missouri et al	To Intervene	source
Ohio	In Support of Nobody	source
PA, GA, MI, WI	Response of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to motion submitted.
Members of PA General Assembly	In Support of Plaintiff/Defendants	source
PA State Senators	In Support of Neither Party	source
DC + 22 States and Territories in support of Defendents	In Support of Defendants	source
Christian Family Coalition	In Support of Plaintiff	source
State of Michigan	In Opposition	source

[Loud Mime]

John Eastman is the dean of the Fowler law school at Chapman University and a frequent contributor to the Claremont Institute. I work with the latter at times and I’ve gotten to know John. This dude is brutally intelligent. We could ask for no better man to head up this issue.

[RummyChick]

Thanks. I thought he was a former Dean but didn’t bother to go look it up.

At least we have someone on our side that knows Con Law.

[StAnDeliver]

"The Supreme Court will not take up this case because something should have done months earlier."

That is a valid concern.

However, it ignores one critical issue.

Texas opens by directly citing Republican Party v Boockvar -- which is also pending in SCOTUS -- and that opening citation was no accident.

Republican Party PA is the case where PA directly disobeyed an Emergency Order by Justice Alito to segregate ballots. Alito is not going to allow that to pass unaddressed.

* "That all ballots received by mail after 8:00 p.m. on November 3 be segregated and kept “in a secure, safe and sealed container separate from other voted ballots"

[linMcHlp]

“Michael Uhlmann”

Bruce Herschenson was very helpful in regard to a project of mine.

[StAnDeliver]

Ohio In Support of Nobody

Ohio SoS Yost filed the sloppiest amicus so far this crazy election cycle, he wants SCOTUS to support state legislature-only alterations to federal election balloting, so he's technically supporting Texas challenge to SCOTUS; but then Yost decries Texas proposed solution to send the rotten elections in the Respondent's states back. to. their. state. legislatures.

Well CompYost, it's either that, or the in extremis remedy of voiding those Respondent's elections and a do-again.

You Buckeyes have some house-cleaning to do right away.

[Fury]

What this really comes down to is the states of Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin are run and overseen by a bunch of hee-haws. Both Democrat and Republican.

Pretty embarrassing for the residents of these states.

[L,TOWM]

Courts and Governors changing the voting rules for their states when the Constitution says that the method of selecting electors must be set by the State Legislatures. A lot of the mail in ballot and accepting mailed in ballots after election day never got appoved by the legislatures for the States.

There is some factual merit, but how could this be cured at this point? And that may have been an assumption built into the scheme that got hatched last summer...

[WVNan]

I’m 87 and I’m reading it just fine.

[familyop]

I hope enough justices in the Supreme Court have the courage of my forefathers.

[Fawn]

So, If Scotus chickens out....is there any other recourse or is it over?

[Fawn]

How many have to want it?