Posted on 12/08/2020 5:59:53 PM PST by BlackFemaleArmyColonel
SCOTUS GIVES GA, MI, WI, AND PA UNTIL THURSDAY DEC 10 AT 3PM TO RESPOND TO SUIT BROUGHT BY TEXAS.
(Excerpt) Read more at mobile.twitter.com ...
I think it only goes to the House if there is a tie. If states get thrown out the number to win would simply be reduced by half plus 1 of the electors.
I don’t count on him. However, he would have had to twist himself into a pretzel far worse than he did with the ACA decision to deny hearing this.
The fact that 3 of them allegedly voted no is unbelievable to me. This is specifically their jurisdiction and theirs alone.
Exactly my take also
Thank you! Short and directly to the point addressing both the illegalities of changing the election rules or ignoring them completely plus all the evidence fraud. It was clever to tie the fraud directly to the Constitutional issue of the legislature mandating the election requirements, so that barring mandated election observers, allowing no postmarks, ignoring signature requirements, etc., are in and of themselves Constitutional violations.
probably not argue against fraud, rather that Texas has no standing or right ro question another State’s election procedures.
____________________
Yes Texas does have standing because in no case is violating the law part of ‘another state’s election procedure’! These 4 states in question, in violation of Article 2 of the US Constitution and the Equal Protection clause, have disenfranchised the states who KEPT the law.
____________________________________
EXACTLY
they cannot order an election redo, there is not a constitutional basis for that. they can kick it to the legislatures to appoint electors, or kick it to the house, or maybe kick only those states to the house. or they can kick out the illegal ballots.
Well, I would bet Alito is cheesed about how his order was ignored by PA.
As for Thomas and Kavanaugh, what is the saying? Oh yes, "Revenge is a dish best served cold."
Which channel has the blouse buttoned that high?
“ Looks like after reading the Texas suit they decided to go ahead and deny hearing the PA suit in favor of hearing the Texas suit that incorporates the same issues, only includes more states.”
You are a victim of fake news. The SCOTUS denied the EMERGENCY INJUNCTION REQUEST.
The case is still alive.
Kicking out the illegal ballots would mean more or less resetting the counts to midnight on election day.
I think they might figure out that that, is not necessarily the easy way out.
They need to pick the rule of law over the useful idiocy aspect of caving to the Left.
Doesn't sound right if the constitution means a majority of all the electors of all the states.
“Texas has not filed a lawsuit before the Supreme Court; they are not allowed to, under Supreme Court rules. What they filed is a motion asking for permission to file a lawsuit.”
You are correct. And that is why this is going nowhere. Everyone is getting excited because they are mis interpreting this.
I watched Jordan Sekulow, Jay Sekulow’s son, talking about this on Newsmax earlier this evening. And after listening to Jordan, I feel much better than I did when the Supreme Court denied the Pennsylvania case...
Jordan Sekulow: “I can already report now the Supreme Court has put on the docket the parties: Georgia, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan. When you look at the states that were named they have to now respond by Thursday at 3 PM to this bill of complaint. And they have to respond to very specific items. So the Supreme Court is not just considering what Texas filed today they are now going the next step which is we want a response from the states named… Again I think this is very clear. This is the case we’ve been talking about to reach SCOTUS. This is the outcome determinative case. 62 electoral college votes at stake enough to change the outcome of the election.”
And then Jordan added this:
“There are two reliefs sought. One is these legislatures that are all controlled by Republicans can seat new electors because the elections violated the elector’s clause due process and equal protection. And because of that they can seat new electors… And if it went to the House then Republicans control that 27 to 22 so it would be Republicans choosing the next president if it had to go the House of Representatives… This is the major challenge, the one we were waiting for. It has enough electoral votes at stake to change the outcome… The court is deciding that it wants more briefing and it is great news… This is the end all, be all case.”
I just went there to gaze at her twitter avatar...:)
They will blame changes made for the election was because of the pandemic and risk to public health. That’s about all they got and it won’t fly.
—
If the constitution can be voided for a health emergency, then there will forever be a health emergency..
I was being facetious...
If the LIBs had anticipated a problem, there would have been all kinds of ‘new’ cases.
Much like after a PDJT ‘rally’ there is a spike but a LIB ‘celebrity’ funeral over 3 states, no problem.
Back in the W days and the WMDs in Iraq, I believe the admin had data and actually believed the WMDs were there.
If they didn’t believe any there and just wanted an ‘excuse’, plenty of material(s) would have been found...<: <: <:
I suppose the decision has already been made; the SCOTUS Justices don’t live in a cave, maybe some read Free Republic. My question is what consideration is being given to all of the global aspects of this that Powell has alleged? Foreign servers, Repubkian gov and SOS in GA corrupt and in on the fraud? Has to be contemplated, if true.
Yep. The Deep State was never going to allow Trump to be re-elected. And most of the country will shrug, including a lot of conservatives, when the election is officially stolen by the DEMs.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.