To: mmichaels1970
That wasn’t where I was going. They violated their constitutions by allowing their SOS and Governors to impose voting policies that only the legislatures could approve. They did not do that.
357 posted on
12/08/2020 7:17:32 PM PST by
Abbeville Conservative
(Preventing the theft of the 2020 Presidential Election is that hill we've talked about)
To: Abbeville Conservative
They violated their constitutions by allowing their SOS and Governors to impose voting policies that only the legislatures could approve.
Yes. That’s the entirety of the case before SCOTUS. But all SCOTUS can do, is order them to “unviolate it”. If the state wants their electors to be recognized, it is up to them to remedy this violation in a constitutional manner. I don’t see how SCOTUS could do anything else.
SCOTUS should rule that their popular election was invalid. But they will punt it back to the state’s legislative branches to remedy it.
They could possibly impose a deadline to ensure the resolution is in place in time to be heard again, but I can’t see what else they could do.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson