Posted on 12/07/2020 8:22:59 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
remember when they said it was about the actions of consenting ADULTS in PRIVATE?
Now it is minors in public schools intruding on girls’ privacy.
This is a huge mistake by the Supreme Court of the United States of America! Men who say they are women should not be allowed in women’s bathrooms and the same with women who say they are men should not be allowed in men’s bathrooms.
Heh, I recall from back in the 90s this one Democrat nitwit on a California city council (I seem to recall it was SF) expressing her outrage over someone giving testimony that faggots engaged in sodomy. She insisted that was not was homosexuals do.
But, yeah, it was always gonna go to the extreme when you consider that the engine behind the acceptance of homosexuality and it being championed in society is people who refuse to retain the knowledge of the Lord being turned over to reprobate minds.
Lawrence v Texas was only 17 years ago.
So many in the so-called historic gay rights movement leadership have pursued minors and even joined NAMBLA.
Even Human Rights Campaign is so infested.
Same with Drag Queen Story Hour.
Their sex is assigned at birth by nature.
I wish the North American Marlin Brando Look Alikes would just kick the shit out of that other NAMBLA already.
Actually, pretty much if anyone would.
“Real Men”, “Real Women “ and “Crazy” would be the signs I would put up.
Conservative Supreme Court?
If his second term SCOTUS appointments are as "good" as the ones from his first term, that won't help much.
Perhaps conservatives should stop fawning over EVERY judge advertised as an "originalist" and immediately rubber stamping them to a lifetime tenure with no questions asked.
The big question is, what will parents do? Will they complain for a while and then go along with it, or will there be a mass exodus from the government school system?
I will bet that ‘Dallas’ really is ‘The Dalles’.
This is probably a valid result legally.
There is no constitutional right to have a one-sex bathroom. We do it because it is the right thing to do, not because the constitution requires it.
So, while our governments should be ALLOWED to restrict bathroom use based on waste organ type, they are not constitutionally required to do so.
That’s not a command, swine.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
M. Thatcher made you look like a dumbass.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.