[brownsfan]

Their TV tells them this is ok. Americans are fine with this.

[Guenevere]

Bump

[Savage Beast]

All of this must go to the Supreme Court. When? How?

If they fail us, we are lost. America is lost.

[kvanbrunt2]

Keep in mind these are not real votes being tabulated. They are feeds wither to the NYT from Edison or feeds from NYT to somewhere else. For those results you would need to review the actual vote server in the county being tabulated. Each county has it’s own domain. according to the documentation.

[Blood of Tyrants]

DemoKKKrats don’t care as long as their guy “wins”.

[Georgia Girl 2]

But Fox news wouldn’t lie. 🙄

[rlmorel]

Dan Bongino did a great summary on his podcast of this article from "Vote Integrity": Anomalies in Vote Counts and Their Effects on Election 2020

In summary, the analyst(s) who created that paper talk about the various dumps that took place throughout the battleground states (Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Georgia) that showed an astonishing disparity in just four of the major ones:

• An update in Michigan listed as of 6:31AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 141,258 votes for Joe Biden and 5,968 votes for Donald Trump
  
  
• An update in Wisconsin listed as 3:42AM Central Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 143,379 votes for Joe Biden and 25,163 votes for Donald Trump
  
  
• A vote update in Georgia listed at 1:34AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 136,155 votes for Joe Biden and 29,115 votes for Donald Trump
  
  
• An update in Michigan listed as of 3:50AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 54,497 votes for Joe Biden and 4,718 votes for Donald Trump

The fundamental premise is that you can have two things, both of which are (from a statistical perspective) reasonable, explainable, and plausible individually: Huge vote disparities, and huge volumes of votes.

As he puts it, if you go to an apartment building in Manhattan, nobody would bat an eye if you got 99% of the voters in that single apartment building casting a vote for Biden. It is a small population. But as the volume of votes goes up, and a whole precinct of votes comes in, you get large volumes of votes, and the disparities in numbers in a small population shrink as the volume of votes grows. It is an inverse relationship, and like water finding its own level, eventually you won't have disparities of 99% for one candidate and 1% for the other, it is going to begin to approach the national (or wider regional levels) of disparity, which in a battleground state, is going to be closer to 50-50% or 55-45% that kind of thing, and will not appear to be Saddam Hussein like numbers of 99% to 1%.

Great article, but Dan Bongino explains it very well in his audio or video.

[Theophilous Meatyard III]

I believe I read recently that a “glitch” in the vote machines prevented a full examination of them. Sounds like a “Go back to zero and start it (method of voting) all over again” situation. I’m very suspicious of mail-in voting, too. Maybe an examination of who, what, where, when and why that began is in order.