Help is on the way to understand Sidney Powell's Michigan lawsuit

american thinker ^ | 11/28/2020 | Andrea Widburg

[bitt]

Sidney Powell's Michigan lawsuit is shorter than the Georgia lawsuit she filed (although I suspect that has do to, in part, with a smaller font and different formatting choices). Nevertheless, it's every bit as complex, because while Michigan had the same overarching forms of fraud (fraud revolving around paper ballots and their counting and voting machine fraud), the supporting facts are different. Enter Doug Ross, who has a real knack for creating uncomplicated infographics that clearly explain complicated materials.

If you haven't already seen it, I reproduced here Doug's infographic about the complaint Sidney Powell filed in Georgia. It's a lot easier to understand what he did than it is to understand the complaint. As is the case with all complaints, that document is larded with confusing, and often repetitive, language that plaintiffs must include for procedural reasons.

Because Georgia is in the news owing to the all-important runoff for Senate candidates, a lot of people missed the fact that, at the same time she filed the complaint in Georgia, Powell also filed a lawsuit in Michigan. At a fundamental level, the complaint is the same as that in Georgia. That is, both charge that the two states violated voting laws, engaged in massive ballot fraud, and engaged in computer voting machine fraud.

Each state has its unique factual wrinkles. In Michigan, Democrats were extraordinarily aggressive when it came to barring Republicans from observing the mail-in ballot vote counting. Meanwhile, in Georgia, Democrats pretended that the vote-counting venue had suffered a dramatic pipe burst and locked out observers, only to continue counting.

These unique factual wrinkles matter at an evidentiary level. The complaints have different eyewitnesses and different expert witnesses. If you've read the Georgia complaint, that's not the same as having read the Michigan complaint.

[bitt]

p

[Deepeasttx]

Is it me? Seems most (if not all) persons involved in the hands-on fraud just happen to be black folk?

I’m sure the higher-ups probably no so.

[faucetman]

“is it me? Seems most (if not all) persons involved in the hands-on fraud just happen to be black folk?”

Is it curious that the person who was caught ripping down my Trump 2020 banner was a Black female?

Anecdotal I’m sure.

[D Rider]

Dems tend to use blacks for their dirty work. Guess who gets left holding the bag.

[Vlad0]

1. Why should anyone trust votes counted by a "black box" voting machine? (like Dominion, or any others)

2. "Voting observers" can only see people putting paper ballots into counting machines. They have no idea what the machines are doing with them, because that work is being done by software running on the machine.

3. Essentially "voting observers" might catch some obvious cheating like throwing out paper votes, but cannot catch the potentially much larger and ubiquitous cheating in the software.

4. Let's see the source code. Let's verify that the source code, when compiled, results in the object and executable code that was actually run on the machines.

5. Source code is almost always kept in some sort of "version control system" - those need to be impounded and imaged (duplicated) ASAP.

LET US SEE THE PLACE WHERE THE MAGIC HAPPENS!

[Revel]

The Michigan lawsuit was unreadable.

[Gene Eric]

Plenty of White scumbags managing, directing, participating.

[Jess Kitting]

The ironic thing is that in Michigan they may be keeping a Black man out of the senate with their shenanigans.

[preacher]

l8r

[Jeff Chandler]

Here’s a good rundown from a legal perspective.

https://youtu.be/G-Aa3D7tIFQ

[TBP]

We need Meecheegan.

[Robert DeLong]

They do that so they can claim racism should they be challenged.

[ConjunctionJunction]

It’s also so they can call anyone “racist” if they object.

[Widget Jr]

The same with the Project Acorn fraud. The people on the bottom tended to be poor or minorities. The people at the top were white or rich.

Gues who got convicted, who skated, and who gets called racist for wanting more secure voting?

[mosaicwolf]

These are what the Communist Party refers to as useful Idiots.

[veracious]

Vald is correct about where the _magic_ happens.

Once the election _counts_ are in the computer, the software/algorithms then do whatever they want to the numbers and results. Voodoo. Black conjuring magic. Pretend vote counting...

[caww]

No it’s not you....it’s a mindset that believes you take what you want when you want it and can get it. The Dems know that many in the black population will do their dirty bidding and the price is always right.

That’s another reason they don’t want to lose black support.

[kiryandil]

Patrick Byrne pointed out in his video that the Democrat overseers did this deliberately so that they could scream RACISM!!! if the scheme was scrutinized.

[kiryandil]

The ironic thing is that in Michigan they may be keeping a Black man out of the senate with their shenanigans.

Twice.

They did the same thing in 2018 in the John James-Stabenow race.