Yes, Rudy. At one point, DJT’s attorney in the all-important Federal District Court for Pennsylvania was a Linda Ann Kerns.
Google her. Check out her website. God bless her, she tried, but she was clearly in way over her head.
If a lone soldier is left on the front lines to stop an armored column, I don’t blame the soldier for losing the battle. I blame the colonel who put her there.
Trump trusts Rudy. Rudy is his kind of guy.
I think even Kushner would have a hard time getting Trump to let go of Rudy...and this is coming from someone who blames Kushner for the horrible ground game of this election.
Not a lawyer so please forgive dumb questions.
If rudy dropped fraud unilaterally and there is no amending the complaint then can someone else pick up the banner in a new complaint?
IIRC someone else mentioned that rudy should back off and regroup, but how can he if there is no way to amend his complaint?
I thought a major issue in PA was the constitutionality of the PA SC rulings extending mail in ballot deadlines beyond Nov. 3 or whenever specified by the PA legislature— not certain what happened to that.
If the 3rd circuit had favored rudy, would that have ultimately resulted in the introduction of a longer delay to a decision and order (iow could the 3rd decision be construed in any way as doing rudy a favor in terms of timetable)?
Is there a possibility that this is all a feint, that is, legal kabuki, and the main charge is imminent on a different flank and/or new evidence and/or a different (eg military) jurisdication? this would imply that rudy, trump and gang (sekulow etc) cooked up whatever it is they are serving now so that they can drop a bigger bomb later with more payload and more ultimate damage somehow due to more surprise— and/or perhaps they are aimed at a delay or a major embarrassment at the Congressional level, when the EC reports and individual Congresscritters can object.
Is there value in actually deliberately tanking a case at the 3rd circuit level presuming that there is a bigger case somewhere else that has more certainty of saving the day for trump? for example, consider that if the USSC is set up by lawyers for deciding a number of cases in favor of trump in rapid succession, might this not be used by Democrats as a reason to rise up and call for some kind of overthrow based on some kind of presumed pro-trump conspiracy at the USSC level, thus causing widespread unintended consequences for the nation in terms of months of riots and violence that could be avoided by a “loss leader” case that pro-trump forces could point to and say with some justification that the USSC is not just a bunch of pro-trump puppet judges?
Can the alleged German server data still be successfully brought into some court under a different complaint?