Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Sides with Religious Groups Against Andrew Cuomo, 5-4
breitbart ^ | 25 Nov 2020 | JOEL B. POLLAK

Posted on 11/26/2020 8:25:59 AM PST by MarvinStinson

The U.S. Supreme Court granted an injunction Wednesday evening against New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s restrictions on religious services in a 5-4 decision that saw Justice Amy Coney Barrett with the conservative majority — and Chief Justice John Roberts siding with the liberal minority.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: cuomo; didyousearch; roberts
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

1 posted on 11/26/2020 8:25:59 AM PST by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

Pos


2 posted on 11/26/2020 8:26:59 AM PST by Williams (Stop Tolerating The Intolerant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

Roberts has definitely gone to the dark side.


3 posted on 11/26/2020 8:28:24 AM PST by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

Shoulda been 6-3


4 posted on 11/26/2020 8:29:12 AM PST by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

Thank you Justice Amy, Justice Thomas, Justice Alito.

Thank you Justice Gorsuch

Thank you Justice Kavanaugh

—-

F U Justice Roberts , JUSTICE BREYER, JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR and JUSTICE KAGAN !!!

—-

“ JUSTICE GORSUCH, concurring.
Government is not free to disregard the First Amend- ment in times of crisis.”

—-

“ JUSTICE KAVANAUGH, concurring.
I vote to grant the applications of the Roman Catholic Di- ocese of Brooklyn and Agudath Israel of America for temporary injunctions against New York’s 10-person and 25-person caps on attendance at religious services.”

—-

Per Curium
“ There is no justification for that proposed course of action. It is clear that this matter is not moot.

See Federal Election Comm’n v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc., 551 U. S. 449, 462 (2007);
Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc., 528 U. S. 167, 189 (2000).

And injunctive relief is still called for because the applicants remain under a constant threat that the area in question will be reclassified as red or orange.

See, e.g., Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus, 573 U. S. 149, 158 (2014).

The Governor regularly changes the classification of particular areas without prior notice.

If that occurs again, the reclassification will almost certainly bar individuals in the affected area from attending services before judicial relief can be obtained.

At most Catholic churches, Mass is celebrated daily, and “Orthodox Jews pray in [Agudath Israel’s] synagogues every day.” Application in No. 20A90, at 4.

Moreover, if reclassification occurs late in a week, as has happened in the past, there may not be time for applicants to seek and obtain relief from this Court before another Sabbath passes.

Thirteen days have gone by since the Diocese filed its application, and Agudath Israel’s application was filed over a week ago.

While we could presumably act more swiftly in the future, there is no guarantee that we could provide relief before another weekend passes.

The applicants have made the showing needed to obtain relief, and there is no reason why they should bear the risk of suffering further irreparable harm in the event of another reclassification.

For these reasons, we hold that enforcement of the Governor’s severe restrictions on the applicants’ religious services must be enjoined.

It is so ordered

——-

“ CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS, dissenting.

I would not grant injunctive relief under the present cir- cumstances. There is simply no need to do so.

After the Diocese and Agudath Israel filed their applications, the Governor revised the designations of the affected areas.

None of the houses of worship identified in the applications is now subject to any fixed numerical restrictions.

At these locations, the applicants can hold services with up to 50% of capacity, which is at least as favorable as the relief they currently seek.”

....
“The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday night blocked New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo from reimposing strict attendance caps at worship services in areas hit hard by the novel coronavirus.

The court ruled 5-4 to bar Cuomo from enforcing his Oct. 6 “Cluster Initiative” against houses of worship that sued to challenge the restrictions. “

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20a87_4g15.pdf


5 posted on 11/26/2020 8:30:15 AM PST by Pikachu_Dad ("the media are selling you a line of soap)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikachu_Dad

“Cluster Initiative” ... they left out the second word.


6 posted on 11/26/2020 8:31:38 AM PST by glennaro (Going through life ignorant and afraid is truly no way to live, but the Democrat/Left doesn't agree)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pikachu_Dad

Justice Roberts is a backstabbing traitor to the Constitution.


7 posted on 11/26/2020 8:31:48 AM PST by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: madison10

Roberts has been owned by the Left ever since he acquired his kids in an illegal matter. The Left lets him do what he wants unless he is told otherwise. A prime example is his contortions and last minute change to uphold Obamacare.


8 posted on 11/26/2020 8:35:12 AM PST by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: madison10

Roberts has exposed himself as the Benedict Arnold of the SCOTUS.


9 posted on 11/26/2020 8:36:33 AM PST by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Gorsuch’s concurrence is a bare knuckles take down of Roberts. He call him, in effect, a coward.

Kavanaugh’s concurrence is chilling. He indicates that he is for sale.

Wouldn’t count on any good election decisions from this Court.


10 posted on 11/26/2020 8:37:16 AM PST by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

here’s hoping that the lib justices get tired of being on the 5-4 losing streak and decide to retire to academia... and trump wins another 4 years and can replace them all.


11 posted on 11/26/2020 8:38:15 AM PST by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world or something)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

Thank you ACB.
Thank you President Trump.


12 posted on 11/26/2020 8:39:12 AM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikachu_Dad
I would not grant injunctive relief under the present cir- cumstances. There is simply no need to do so.

Except of course for the $15,000 fine deBlasio has assessed on a synagogue for the crime of celebrating a wedding.

13 posted on 11/26/2020 8:39:23 AM PST by nuke_road_warrior (Making the world safe for nuclear power for over 20 years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pikachu_Dad

Reading that language, Roberts issued that dissent just because he could without affecting the outcome. He has become quite a politician in recent years.


14 posted on 11/26/2020 8:40:00 AM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

Four kinds of federal judges:

Lazy

Cowardly

Leftist- here is the result I want, now have the clerks back fill with some of that law crap.

Unicorn- follow the law even if it leads someplace that my political leanings don’t like.

Roberts isn’t a traitor, he is a coward. He wants to keep the Court out of anything that might make it unpopular or controversial. In short, he is the perfect Bush type Republican. Stand for everything and fight for nothing. Be a compassionate conservative and walk down the middle of the road. Reach across the aisle and above all, COVET the praise of the inside set. Don’t upset the apple cart. Be a stand up guy, go along to get along.

And most of all, decry and turn your back on those who actually fight for the principles you claim to believe in.


15 posted on 11/26/2020 8:45:26 AM PST by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

I don’t buy that, that is the hold on him.

Why do I say that? Here are the two most popular theories.

A) Illegal adoption: (Your theory.) Common people wouldn’t fault him over it. So having it made public would have little impact. He broke foreign (Irish I think !) law again so few people would care. People would be extremely sympathetic. Anyway these kids are grown now.

B) Hidden homosexuality: Maybe ? Nowadays who cares about that? If he came out of the closet as bisexual it would be a yawner. We just had a homosexual DNI. (Note not happy with this turn of the culture but its there.)

Got to be something else!


16 posted on 11/26/2020 8:51:02 AM PST by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

Uniparty Grand Dragon Dubya gave us Roberts


17 posted on 11/26/2020 8:52:38 AM PST by The Fop (God Bless Donald Trump, Frank Sinatra, Joan Rivers, and the Fightin' Rat Pack Wing of the GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reily

The simplest explanation for Roberts is that he’s just a leftist @sshole.


18 posted on 11/26/2020 9:00:18 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("There's somebody new and he sure ain't no rodeo man.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Justice Roberts is obviously being blackmailed.

The socialists own him....lock,stock,and barrel.

Justice Roberts needs to put the future of our Constitutional Republic ahead of his own selfish interests.


19 posted on 11/26/2020 9:05:11 AM PST by BrexitBen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Reily

C) The videos and photos of him in extremely compromising positions with little boys on Epstein Island.


20 posted on 11/26/2020 9:08:19 AM PST by ponygirl (An Appeal to Heaven )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson