Are you Fido969 posting under a different name? Because they used the same “we wuz robbed” cliche, and made your exact same arguments in this and other posts.
https://www.brighteon.com/dc76e954-ae40-405b-a7b9-5d6f18ba5976
Here’s the post I sent Fido969, which they completely ignored of course, because it appears they/you are only here to undercut these trial cases before they are even submitted:
Are you inferring you have a better option to fight the election fraud? Who might that be? Why haven’t they done diddly yet then?
Or are you just saying you’ve already accepted that “we waz robbed” and don’t even feel like it should be contested, it’s just part of the game?
Or maybe even, you don’t even think we waz robbed, and Trump just lost on his own? Please expound on what better options we have, or if you even feel this is worth contesting, at all.
Because each of you that is trying to discredit these cases, before they are even submitted, is giving ammunition to the enemy. They show our opposition that we aren’t united. Worst of all, they give the Judges the little bit of cover that they may need to rule against them, even if they are legally sound once submitted.
So go ahead and give us your supposedly better options, and why you want to divide us and undercut these cases before they’re even submitted.
Please re-read my post. There is nothing you say which is relevant. You did not even comprehend a very simple aspect, how and why I used the phrase “We wuz robbed.”
Bless your heart! When you address what I said I will be happy to respond.
No, he’s not me. But, I can see he is a clear and logical thinker.
Look, we’re all cheering for Sidney. But we’ve been burned too many times. Demanding belief without proof is cultist.