Please re-read my post. There is nothing you say which is relevant. You did not even comprehend a very simple aspect, how and why I used the phrase “We wuz robbed.”
Bless your heart! When you address what I said I will be happy to respond.
I read your post which was basically identical to Fido’s yesterday, and you used the exact same odd cliche which caught my eye.
It’s clear you are attempting to claim Ms.Powell is a scam artist, whose only goal is to sell books at some point in the future. You are doing this before her case has even been submitted to the court, as an attempt to discredit it.
My questions to you are quite relevant in this regard. Here they are again:
Are you inferring you have a better option to fight the election fraud? Who might that be? Why haven’t they done diddly yet then?
Or are you just saying you’ve already accepted that “we waz robbed” and don’t even feel like it should be contested, it’s just part of the game?
Or maybe even, you don’t even think we waz robbed, and Trump just lost on his own? Please expound on what better options we have, or if you even feel this is worth contesting, at all.
Because each of you that is trying to discredit these cases, before they are even submitted, is giving ammunition to the enemy. They show our opposition that we aren’t united. Worst of all, they give the Judges the little bit of cover that they may need to rule against them, even if they are legally sound once submitted.
So go ahead and give us your supposedly better options, and why you want to divide us and undercut these cases before they’re even submitted.