“I think it’s because we’re pursuing two different theories,” Giuliani told Fox Business host Lou Dobbs.
____________________________________
It would seem like a poor choice of words to use ‘theory’ in this context.
Battle on two fronts, must be driving the idiots mad
RIGHT !
Giuliani should not speak of “THEORIES” if he have clues and facts !
Sydney POWELL doesn’t use that word ! And her stance is completly consistant with the whole picture as we can see it by different sources .
I am following her 100% . In addition it needs courage and stamina to stand firm on that stance .
Many “men” should learn something here
“Theory” is the proper term, legally. It means the theory of the case, or why the facts represent a violation of US law, whether the constitution, laws, or regulations.
And “I think” is a giant hedge.
That struck me too. It makes the effort sound like an academic exercise instead of a law suit.
He should be outraged and ready to show harm to the American citizens.
I was concerned about what I called “small ball” approach of what is now the Guliani team. To date, as best I can tell, he has not produced a road map as to how they can “reclaim” the necessary votes to flip enough states even to deny Biteme the 270.
“It would seem like a poor choice of words to use ‘theory’ in this context.”
Because most confuse theory with being just a WAG!
“Theory” is normal legal-speak.
“Theory of the crime” & “Theory of the defense” kind of thing.
A word that causes no pause to those experienced in courts.