[dp0622]

what he’s saying is that if biden’s vote counted for 1.25 in the machine and Trump’s counted for .75, that would have showed in the recount.

I think that’s what he’s saying.

And I don’t understand nearly enough of what’s going on to agree or disagree :)

[rlbedfor]

I am very skeptical of machine manipulation due to the recount in GA.

[cgbg]

if biden’s vote counted for 1.25 in the machine and Trump’s counted for .75, that would have showed in the recount.

Yup--agreed, on a statewide basis.

However, in the Democratic controlled precincts with no adult supervision, the "recount" could have been "fixed" to match the desired totals.

[jmclemore]

“if biden’s vote counted for 1.25 in the machine and Trump’s counted for .75, that would have showed in the recount.”

Correct, the machine and software maybe able to adjust the totals but it can not change the pysical ballot. If they have the actual ballots, a hand recount should expose a divination between the two.

This is the argument against reprocessing ballots a second time allowing the algorithm to apply it’s vote flip yet again. Hand count must be done in a away that counters only know their totals but not the totals of the other counters.