Posted on 11/21/2020 1:06:20 PM PST by lowbridge
I was a libertarian in my younger days.
Buckley _hated_ us—and told me that to my face!
What an idiot
S Powell already said they (Dems) were trying to use Georgia to show Dominion was on the up and up.
This is the state that had the shredder come to the vote counting center, correct?
Did it occur to the writer of the article that the TOTAL lack of transparency in the ballot inspection is cover to make the ballots match the totals?
The count was established. Just make the # of ballots match.
You don’t understand what Georgia did.
They DIDN’T recount the paper ballots filled out by the voters.
They counted ballots produced by the voting machines; putative duplicates, but not the original ballots.
So the ballots output by the machines for “recounting” would have reflected any changes made by those machines from the original ballots.
The ONLY legitimate recount would have used the original paper ballots marked by the voters. This was not done. The recount was yet another fraud.
The Trump campaign is challenging the validity of the recount as well:
It was not done in the presence of trained GOP observers.
They can’t prove the ballots they recounted were the same ballots they entered into the machines.
The machines are capable of printing out images of counted ballots - which would of course include any machine switched or machine added “ballots“.
So yes, a true and proper recount would have exposed any problems with the machines - it the “recount” they did does not prove anything.
‘
National Review is a bastion of Trump Haters.
They don’t think Joe and Hunter should be questioned about Ukraine.
See, that’s acceptable corruption.
‘
“They DIDN’T recount the paper ballots filled out by the voters.
They counted ballots produced by the voting machines; putative duplicates, but not the original ballots.”
If that is what happened, then true, it’s not clean.
I suppose there would be a desire to preserve the original ballots, but it’s odd that such a procedure is considered normal.
How sure are you of this.
JOHN MCCORMACK can probably show you his ballot. Where he voted for Biden.
NR neglects to mention that there was no audit of the ballots themselves.
And they wonder why nobody believes anything they say anymore?
in which of the disputed States was it a requirement by law that all votes were in the polling center by 8pm on election night?
OK Owen, can you wrap your mind around this? They stopped the count late that evening on Election Day when they realized President Trump was winning. Then hit the red panic button on the software. They then looked at the number of votes the machine had jacked and had their Democrat minions Xerox that number of bogus ballots for Biden to put in the archive. The recount counted the accurate and bogus ballots just the same.
Although as you have already been told, the initial recount instructions given to the recounting teams was only to count a statistical sample of the total ballots. I'll look up that press statement from just after the election.
Buckley attacked Welch and the John Birch Society in the 50s and 60s. Someone somehow got hold of their membership lists. And then they became marginalized once Welch died.
Buckley promoted Kissinger to Nixon for SoS.
Buckley promoted the Iraq war, along with other neocons, according to Pat Buchanan.
Buckley helped Westbrook Pegler get fired. And then threw him a retirement party.
Buckley fired Joe Sobran.
Buckley was acceptable to the New York intelligentsia because he kept conservatives in line, unpopular and unpopulist.
Consequently, we was rewarded with lucrative book contracts and his TV show.
I know nothing of machine capability. I was not aware the count was of machine produced ballots. It would mean loading a lot of paper in if they did that.
But, if that does happen, yup, the machines could be corrupt as hell.
It does make a little sense. The regulations probably insist on preservation of the original ballots.
And . . . this could be the explanation for perfectly filled out ballots with no creases and perfectly filled bubbles.
The observer maybe was not seeing the original ballot.
Regardless, the real problem in GA was the SoS allowing no signature verify.
So why does Dominion Software’s system provide for proportional ratio adjustment of vote totals if it is not ever used? If SmartMatic was going to design a system to cheat that included printed ballots don’t you think they would have figured a way to get around this discovery risk? Did they check the QR codes against the voter’s actual intents? Were these the actual paper ballots of the voters or reprinted copies that had adjusted QR codes to fit the final output totals?
In the end the mail-in lack of security and validation swamps whatever tricks the electronic system might have been up to. If we can’t see the original signatures on the envelopes, the ballots, and the voter rolls, we are just taking the casino’s word for it that we lost the hand to a fair deck. That’s called being a sucker.
Et tu, National Review?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.