[RebelTXRose]

You are the first person to mention that. What happened to the old consent agreement where GOP had to promise not to talk about voter fraud? I know the judge on it first died, but his successor kept it going.

[Enterprise]

The old consent decree expired Dec 1, 2017. The expiration was upheld by an Obama appointed judge!

As reported by NJ.com on January 9, 2018, Judge Vazquez ruled that the Democratic National Committee did not prove that the RNC violated the Consent Decree prior to its Dec. 1, 2017, expiration date. And with that, Judge Vazquez, an Obama appointee, ended that noxious 1982 Consent Decree legal agreement between the RNC and DNC which had tied the Republican Party’s hands from contesting elections and investigating vote fraud for 36 years.

[frog in a pot]

What happened to the old consent agreement where GOP had to promise not to talk about voter fraud?

You raise an important question!

There are two litigation agreements readily available on the record. A March 6, 2020 agreement with GA concerning mail-in signature procedures and a March 8 agreement with Gwinnett county concerning the form of the envelope (and perhaps the ballot itself).

(The plaintiffs were represented by Hillary and Obama's D.C law firm and one could question just how hard the defense lawyers worked on behalf of GA voters!)

Neither of those agreements concern promises to not discuss fraud or the registration date for run-off election voters.

However, the GA SOS office advises the final registration date for run-off voters was December 7. That date is clearly inconsistent with the 2019 statute referred to upthread.

It appears something significant happened to that statutory language during this critical period. Perhaps, as you suggest there is yet a third agreement not easily available to the public?