He’s pointed out examples where mundane chicanery has clearly occurred, and mocked the other networks for pretending it doesn’t exist.
In regards Powell’s claims it is more complex: she hasn’t produced evidence - but assuming she had it, she wouldn’t the details of this type of evidence at this stage until she has a chance to declare it in court.
NONSENSE! He may have mocked the OTHER netwoks bur never his own. As far as Sidney Powell, why should she try her case in the press by disclosing all the evidence she has. Tucker cooked his own goose. HE IS NO CONSERVATIVE!
did you read what I actually wrote? In part you argue against my words by claiming the same thing I wrote.
Why should he be? People used to say the same thing about O'Reilly. They are supposed to be fair and balanced. All I ever wanted to see from Fox News people was fair treatment. I used to like Greta when when she was on Fox. She was reputedly a lib, but very even-handed and fair with guests of whatever political leaning. If Tucker is asking for more "evidence" from Sydney than he would from Schiff, then I would have a problem with it.
During the height of the peaceful protests rioting and pillaging, I think Tucker helped the GOP by pointing out that the rioting was going on in 'rat controlled cities. But he was critical of the President and kept saying that Trump should "do something" to stop it. He has never been an outright GOP or Trump cheerleader.
P.S. I seldom watch TV news, including Fox. I watched the convention and Trump's rallies on OAN.