Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Red6

“...They won’t do well trying to compete with CNN and MSNBC... Abandoning their market I do not think was a prudent long term strategy. But I am sure they have a lot of experts and data internally to support their decision....”

They’re not listening to any “experts” or “internal data”
Keep in mind, it’s now run by rabidly insane lib women that are making serious corporate decisions based solely on raw emotions of mostly hate. Both Tucker and Hannity would both be wise to looking for other gigs because it’s only a matter of time before both of these guys are finished at FOX.


79 posted on 11/20/2020 9:08:22 AM PST by lgjhn23 (Libs are a virus.....the DemoVirus!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: lgjhn23

https://variety.com/2019/tv/features/suzanne-scott-fox-news-ceo-1203177554/

I didn’t know they have new management.

This does not surprise me. In America we deny differences and pretend there is equality, except when looking for the “gay gene” never found. LOL

Women are different then men. They are not only physically different, they are emotionally / psychologically constructed differently. It’s hard to deny the physical differences, because they are obviously smaller, lighter (well, not the feminist US types that think they are all princesses and weigh in over 200 lbs), but they are also psychologically built different, even though this is hard to prove in a way that is undeniable for the equality seekers in the US that deny bell curves with IQ etc...

Chicks think different then men.


111 posted on 11/20/2020 10:48:53 AM PST by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

To: lgjhn23
Previous to the last few decades, media outlets had to at least cover their expenses or they would go out of business. Now that fabulously wealthy people have decided to own media outlets for propaganda purposes, such as WaPo, NYTimes and FoxNews, they no longer have to care about having enough readers, viewers or advertisers to keep afloat.

This is not what the framers had in mind when they put Freedom of the Press in the Bill of Rights. The almost unlimited wealth of several people was not even imagined in the 1700’s.

122 posted on 11/20/2020 2:06:30 PM PST by Freee-dame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson